On Feb 24, 8:16 am, "321design" <321des...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> On Feb 24, 5:13 am, Wolfgang Barth <bart...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
>
>
> > 321design wrote:
> > > Why doesn't some body make a small cell phone that will fit in my
> > > pocket and not make people ask "is that a cell phone in my pocket or
> > > am I happy to see me?" I don't care about a camera, or MP3 player, I
> > > just want a small phone. And I don't like wearing one on my belt
> > > either. While you are at it, improve the sound quality.
>
> > There are hundreds of GSM phones on the market.
>
> > You need a THIN one. Thin ones do not tend to be the cheapest. But I
> > like my original first series Motorola Razr V3. It is very thin.
> > Ebay sells it for 130$ or so UNLOCKED usable for all networks!
>
> > Or the Motorola L2 silver. Very thin. Unlocked for just 90$.
>
> > Both are quadband and usable in ALL GSM networks.
>
> > > Anybody know who has the smallest cell phone available to Verizon
> > > customers?
>
> > It does not matter, that you are a Verizon customer. Just put your
> > Verizon SIM card into the unlocked GSM phone and thats it.
>
> > Wolfgang
>
> Thanks Wolfgang for the response.
> I've heard that the Razor has poor sound quality. What isthe
> difference between the V3 and the L2? Is it worth the extra $40?
> Are there anyother phones out there that are small and are quadband
> that you can suggest? I've also heard (no pun intended) that Motorola
> phones have VG sound quality.
>
> Rob
The RAZR doesn't have poor sound quality. The software on the phone is
basically the same but the L2 is a lower end phone. Opt for the L7 or
SLVR ( Same phone).
Have a good one
3GFreak
www.mobilevertigo.com
|
