Talk About Network

Google




Electronic Equipment > Cell Phone Tech > Re: Legality of...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 32 of 48 Topic 491 of 536
Post > Topic >>

Re: Legality of: Cell-Phone signal blocking

by "BC" <billchapman@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Jul 18, 2007 at 08:09 PM

Hello All,

Thank you so much for all the interesting replys. I appreciate the
numerous 
responses.

Please allow me to respond to my original post.

I am curious if some of the "cell-phone jamming devices "actually work as 
the various manufacturers say they do.
I have seen  myriad different devices advertised for sale claiming various

areas of effective attenuation for diameters ranging from , some claim 30,

50 meters and more.
Does anyone have any firsthand experience with any of these devises and 
which ones if so?

I of course would want this information for educational purposes only, as
I 
understand they are illegal to operate in my country, the US.

If anyone has any first hand experience with these devices and would be
kind 
enough to share the type, brand name model or whatever you wish, it would
be 
appreciated.

Again, let me thank you for all the responses, and I apologize for any 
breach of netiquette in advance.

Sincerely,

bc

 meters,etc
"Kurt" <labolide@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message 
news:labolide-22A85D.19393118072007@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> In article <Pine.NEB.4.64.0707182214540.478@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
> Straydog <asd@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
>> Yes, I have one. It is always turned off. I call it my
heart-attack-car-
>> accident-emergency phone.
>>
>> I can think of no drug, no behavior, no alcohol, nothing illegal,
nothing
>> unhealthy that is as addicting as cell phones. And, people have no
>> courtesy, consideration, or forsight.
>>
>> I think the idea that it is OK with THEM to force me to listen to their
>> conversations, their ringtones while they are on MY property, or in my
>> presence without my permission, is a personal offense against me.
>
> Straydog,
>
> You may be of a 'certain age' as I am, and I am often bemused with all
> you speak of.
>
> I was watching "The Devil wears Prada" the other night. There was a line
> in the movie (and very true) where the Meryl Streep character states
> something to the effect that the Target/Ross/JCPenney/Sears clothes that
> the assistant was wearing were a direct retooling for the m***** of
> former fa****on trends that the high fa****on industry (she) had created.
>
> So true.
>
> Cell phone are exactly the same. No one would care about cameras in
> phones had the Japanese youth culture not embraced it as they ddid a few
> years ago.
>
> Cell phone mfrs had a tough time selling them to US market -took a
> couple years of hard sell (and huge ad budgets) to finally get youth
> market here on board.
>
> If I were you, I'd buy one of those prepaid emergency phones you see in
> back of Sunset Magazine. These guys hit the nail on the head with the
> niche market they are targeting- a phone with simple features and large
> display.
>
> The irony is that these phones will come back in a few years as hip
> retro accessories, but then again today, little is truly new, only
> recycled (don't get me started about music - you'll never see another
> Doors)
>
> -- 
> To reply by email, remove the word "space"
 




 48 Posts in Topic:
Cell-Phone signal blocking
"BC" <billch  2007-07-07 11:54:47 
Re: Cell-Phone signal blocking
Jer <gdunn@[EMAIL PROT  2007-07-07 17:40:44 
Re: Cell-Phone signal blocking
Notan <notan@[EMAIL PR  2007-07-07 19:30:32 
Re: Cell-Phone signal blocking
Jer <gdunn@[EMAIL PROT  2007-07-07 20:54:14 
Re: Cell-Phone signal blocking
Notan <notan@[EMAIL PR  2007-07-07 20:48:46 
Re: Cell-Phone signal blocking
Jer <gdunn@[EMAIL PROT  2007-07-08 07:13:09 
Re: Cell-Phone signal blocking
Scott <how.do@[EMAIL P  2007-07-08 08:59:56 
Re: Cell-Phone signal blocking
Jer <gdunn@[EMAIL PROT  2007-07-08 16:01:20 
Re: Cell-Phone signal blocking
Scott <how.do@[EMAIL P  2007-07-08 16:13:57 
Re: Cell-Phone signal blocking
Jer <gdunn@[EMAIL PROT  2007-07-08 17:03:21 
Re: Cell-Phone signal blocking
"BruceR" <ra  2007-07-08 14:13:10 
Re: Cell-Phone signal blocking
Jer <gdunn@[EMAIL PROT  2007-07-08 19:40:30 
Re: Cell-Phone signal blocking
"BruceR" <ra  2007-07-08 14:57:36 
Re: Cell-Phone signal blocking
Jer <gdunn@[EMAIL PROT  2007-07-08 21:57:29 
Re: Cell-Phone signal blocking
Scott <how.do@[EMAIL P  2007-07-08 22:04:30 
Re: Cell-Phone signal blocking
Jer <gdunn@[EMAIL PROT  2007-07-08 23:24:53 
Re: Cell-Phone signal blocking
Scott <how.do@[EMAIL P  2007-07-09 18:26:02 
Re: Cell-Phone signal blocking
®©®@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2007-07-09 09:41:00 
Re: Cell-Phone signal blocking
"Prof. Franz Blaha&q  2007-07-09 15:46:52 
Re: Cell-Phone signal blocking
"BruceR" <ra  2007-07-09 11:38:03 
Re: Cell-Phone signal blocking
Scott <how.do@[EMAIL P  2007-07-09 18:41:17 
Re: Legality of: Cell-Phone signal blocking
Todd Allcock <elecconn  2007-07-19 10:41:38 
Re: Cell-Phone signal blocking
"mark krawczuk"  2008-09-06 20:39:45 
Re: Cell-Phone signal blocking
"Richard B. Gilbert&  2008-09-06 08:28:58 
Re: Cell-Phone signal blocking
"Peter Pan" <  2008-09-06 12:37:43 
Re: Cell-Phone signal blocking
David Lesher <wb8foz@[  2008-09-06 18:20:09 
Re: Legality of: Cell-Phone signal blocking
Straydog <asd@[EMAIL P  2007-07-19 10:10:40 
Re: Legality of: Cell-Phone signal blocking
Russell Patterson <me@  2007-07-19 10:50:50 
Re: Cell-Phone signal blocking
"mark krawczuk"  2008-09-06 20:37:30 
Legality of: Cell-Phone signal blocking
Straydog <asd@[EMAIL P  2007-07-18 22:15:29 
Re: Legality of: Cell-Phone signal blocking
Kurt <labolide@[EMAIL   2007-07-18 19:39:31 
Re: Legality of: Cell-Phone signal blocking
"BC" <billch  2007-07-18 20:09:48 
Re: Legality of: Cell-Phone signal blocking
Jer <gdunn@[EMAIL PROT  2007-07-18 22:31:59 
Re: Legality of: Cell-Phone signal blocking
"BC" <billch  2007-07-18 21:09:39 
Re: Legality of: Cell-Phone signal blocking
Notan <notan@[EMAIL PR  2007-07-18 22:14:01 
Re: Legality of: Cell-Phone signal blocking
"BC" <billch  2007-07-18 21:40:49 
Re: Legality of: Cell-Phone signal blocking
Scott <how.do@[EMAIL P  2007-07-20 10:21:40 
Re: Legality of: Cell-Phone signal blocking
Andreas Wenzel <awspam  2007-07-19 19:20:39 
Re: Legality of: Cell-Phone signal blocking
Simon Templar <usenet@  2007-07-21 20:42:42 
Re: Legality of: Cell-Phone signal blocking
Jer <gdunn@[EMAIL PROT  2007-07-18 22:07:17 
Re: Legality of: Cell-Phone signal blocking
Bert Hyman <bert@[EMAI  2007-07-19 12:47:59 
Re: Legality of: Cell-Phone signal blocking
Russell Patterson <me@  2007-07-19 09:33:25 
Re: Legality of: Cell-Phone signal blocking
Straydog <asd@[EMAIL P  2007-07-19 10:00:20 
Re: Legality of: Cell-Phone signal blocking
"GeekBoy" <a  2007-07-20 13:44:05 
Re: Legality of: Cell-Phone signal blocking
Straydog <asd@[EMAIL P  2007-07-19 10:05:41 
Re: Legality of: Cell-Phone signal blocking
Bert Hyman <bert@[EMAI  2007-07-19 14:08:48 
Re: Legality of: Cell-Phone signal blocking
"prc2u1" <pr  2007-07-19 16:00:29 
Re: Legality of: Cell-Phone signal blocking
Russell Patterson <me@  2007-07-19 12:08:02 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
localhost-V2008-12-19 Tue Jan 6 1:51:48 PST 2009.