Talk About Network

Google





Electronic Equipment > Cellular Alltel > Re: CR Survey o...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 16 of 31 Topic 594 of 721
Post > Topic >>

Re: CR Survey of 48,000 cellular users

by "mikeyhsd" <mikeyhsd@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Dec 5, 2007 at 08:30 AM

This is a multi-part message in MIME format.

------=_NextPart_000_0188_01C83719.17212F60
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

personally, dropped verizon at their encouragement the first day numbers =
became ****table in my area.
poor service, no service, dropped calls.
lived in line of sight of 2 verizon towers.
could go out into the yard and SEE them.
sore recommedned buying an external antenna from a mall kiosak. brought =
it back to the store to make sure it was the one they recommended and =
was told then if I pluged it in woujld violate my warrenty. what a bunch =
of bull, since they recommended it to start with.

switched to SPRINT and never looked back.
occasionally have small problems with bilings but they get worked out, =
lots easier than they dia with verizon or at&t.




mikeyhsd@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  "SMS =E6=96=AF=E8=92=82=E6=96=87=E2=80=A2 =E5=A4=8F" =
<scharf.steven@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message =
news:4755f2af$0$84232$742ec2ed@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  -Verizon was #1 in 17 out of 20 markets surveyed (in 2 of those 17 =
they=20
  were tied with T-Mobile)

  -Alltel was #1 in 3 markets (Tampa, Cleveland, and Seattle)

  -Sprint was last in 19 out of 20 markets (AT&T was last in=20
  Minneapolis-Saint Paul, and Sprint was 2nd to last).

  I really thought that the declining number of AMPS handsets would hurt =

  Verizon's ratings, but apparently that was not the case. Even with =
most=20
  users having digital-only phones, Verizon is still far better than =
AT&T,=20
  Sprint, or T-Mobile.

  I wonder how long Sprint can continue in business as an independent=20
  company. They have the worst coverage, a poor selection of handsets, =
and=20
  their Wi-Max plan has gone nowhere. Some say Verizon should acquire=20
  them, but I don't think that Verizon wants or needs them.
------=_NextPart_000_0188_01C83719.17212F60
Content-Type: text/html;
	charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

=EF=BB=BF<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=3DContent-Type content=3D"text/html; charset=3Dutf-8">
<META content=3D"MSHTML 6.00.6000.16546" name=3DGENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=3D#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>personally, dropped verizon at their =
encouragement=20
the first day numbers became ****table in my area.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>poor service, no service, dropped=20
calls.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>lived in line of sight of 2 verizon=20
towers.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>could go out into the yard and SEE=20
them.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>sore recommedned buying an external =
antenna from a=20
mall kiosak. brought it back to the store to make sure it was the one =
they=20
recommended and was told then if I pluged it in woujld violate my =
warrenty. what=20
a bunch of bull, since they recommended it to start with.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>switched to SPRINT and never looked=20
back.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>occasionally have small problems with =
bilings but=20
they get worked out, lots easier than they dia with verizon or=20
at&amp;t.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV>
<P>&nbsp;</P>
<P><FONT color=3D#ff0000>
<MARQUEE scrollAmount=3D2 scrollDelay=3D9 behavior=3Dalternate =
width=3D"35%"=20
bgColor=3D#ffff00 height=3D22><A=20
href=3D"mailto:mikeyhsd@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
">mikeyhsd@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
></MARQUE=
E></FONT></P>
<P>&nbsp;</P></DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE=20
style=3D"PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; =
BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
  <DIV>"SMS =E6=96=AF=E8=92=82=E6=96=87=E2=80=A2 =E5=A4=8F" &lt;<A=20
  =
href=3D"mailto:scharf.steven@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
">scharf.steven@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>&g=
t;=20
  wrote in message <A=20
  =
href=3D"news:4755f2af$0$84232$742ec2ed@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
">news:4755f2af$0$84=
232$742ec2ed@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>...</DIV>-Verizon=20
  was #1 in 17 out of 20 markets surveyed (in 2 of those 17 they =
<BR>were tied=20
  with T-Mobile)<BR><BR>-Alltel was #1 in 3 markets (Tampa, Cleveland, =
and=20
  Seattle)<BR><BR>-Sprint was last in 19 out of 20 markets (AT&amp;T was =
last in=20
  <BR>Minneapolis-Saint Paul, and Sprint was 2nd to last).<BR><BR>I =
really=20
  thought that the declining number of AMPS handsets would hurt =
<BR>Verizon's=20
  ratings, but apparently that was not the case. Even with most =
<BR>users having=20
  digital-only phones, Verizon is still far better than AT&amp;T, =
<BR>Sprint, or=20
  T-Mobile.<BR><BR>I wonder how long Sprint can continue in business as =
an=20
  independent <BR>company. They have the worst coverage, a poor =
selection of=20
  handsets, and <BR>their Wi-Max plan has gone nowhere. Some say Verizon =
should=20
  acquire <BR>them, but I don't think that Verizon wants or needs=20
them.</BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML>

------=_NextPart_000_0188_01C83719.17212F60--
 




 31 Posts in Topic:
CR Survey of 48,000 cellular users
=?UTF-8?B?U01TIOaWr+iSgua  2007-12-04 16:39:04 
Re: CR Survey of 48,000 cellular users
"Cubit" <no@  2007-12-05 01:50:52 
Re: CR Survey of 48,000 cellular users
Kurt <labolide@[EMAIL   2007-12-04 18:06:56 
Re: CR Survey of 48,000 cellular users
clifto <clifto@[EMAIL   2007-12-04 20:16:14 
Re: CR Survey of 48,000 cellular users
"Cubit" <no@  2007-12-05 16:13:45 
Re: CR Survey of 48,000 cellular users
"LHA" <nobod  2007-12-05 08:59:37 
Re: CR Survey of 48,000 cellular users
=?UTF-8?B?U01TIOaWr+iSgua  2007-12-05 08:16:53 
Re: CR Survey of 48,000 cellular users
"Cubit" <no@  2007-12-05 16:16:44 
Re: CR Survey of 48,000 cellular users
"Joel Koltner"   2007-12-04 18:29:17 
Re: CR Survey of 48,000 cellular users
Ron <ron.clifford@[EMA  2007-12-05 14:40:29 
Re: CR Survey of 48,000 cellular users
"Joel Koltner"   2007-12-05 11:01:35 
Re: CR Survey of 48,000 cellular users
=?UTF-8?B?U01TIOaWr+iSgua  2007-12-05 12:01:30 
Re: CR Survey of 48,000 cellular users
=?UTF-8?B?U01TIOaWr+iSgua  2007-12-05 06:54:27 
Re: CR Survey of 48,000 cellular users
Todd Allcock <elecconn  2007-12-06 10:12:02 
Re: CR Survey of 48,000 cellular users
SMS <scharf.steven@[EM  2007-12-06 10:11:46 
Re: CR Survey of 48,000 cellular users
"mikeyhsd" <  2007-12-05 08:30:28 
Re: CR Survey of 48,000 cellular users
Larry <noone@[EMAIL PR  2007-12-05 14:41:08 
Re: CR Survey of 48,000 cellular users
Cellguy <cellguy@[EMAI  2007-12-05 20:34:25 
Re: CR Survey of 48,000 cellular users
Larry <noone@[EMAIL PR  2007-12-05 22:54:53 
Re: CR Survey of 48,000 cellular users
clifto <clifto@[EMAIL   2007-12-06 14:39:58 
Re: CR Survey of 48,000 cellular users
Larry <noone@[EMAIL PR  2007-12-06 23:27:43 
Re: CR Survey of 48,000 cellular users
DTC <me@[EMAIL PROTECT  2007-12-06 16:38:40 
Re: CR Survey of 48,000 cellular users
The Ghost of General Lee   2007-12-06 18:15:54 
Re: CR Survey of 48,000 cellular users
"Cubit" <no@  2007-12-05 16:24:03 
Re: CR Survey of 48,000 cellular users
"mikeyhsd" <  2007-12-05 18:10:48 
Re: CR Survey of 48,000 cellular users
Todd Allcock <elecconn  2007-12-05 13:27:17 
Re: CR Survey of 48,000 cellular users
me@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2007-12-05 23:45:05 
Re: CR Survey of 48,000 cellular users
"Ness-Net" <  2007-12-05 20:52:28 
Re: CR Survey of 48,000 cellular users
=?UTF-8?B?U01TIOaWr+iSgua  2007-12-05 21:13:44 
Re: CR Survey of 48,000 cellular users
arnstein@[EMAIL PROTECTED  2007-12-09 06:03:19 
Re: CR Survey of 48,000 cellular users
DTC <me@[EMAIL PROTECT  2007-12-09 00:14:08 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
localhost-V2008-12-19 Thu Jan 8 10:31:16 PST 2009.