Talk About Network

Google





Electronic Equipment > Cellular Alltel > Re: CR Survey o...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 25 of 31 Topic 594 of 721
Post > Topic >>

Re: CR Survey of 48,000 cellular users

by "mikeyhsd" <mikeyhsd@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Dec 5, 2007 at 06:10 PM

This is a multi-part message in MIME format.

------=_NextPart_000_0561_01C8376A.29DD9E30
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

3 different phones in 4 months, same situation.
store manager lived in near by area and had same problems.
they kept promising to fix it by installing more towers, for 0ver 1 =
year.
am happy with sprint.
even with the occasional burp.



mikeyhsd@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  "Cubit" <no@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message =
news:DgA5j.75799$YL5.45395@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Sounds like you had a defective phone.  If you could see the towers, =
an=20
  external antenna doesn't seem logical.



  "mikeyhsd" <mikeyhsd@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message=20
  news:-9ednVIyBauRK8vanZ2dnUVZ_s6mnZ2d@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  personally, dropped verizon at their encouragement the first day =
numbers=20
  became ****table in my area.
  poor service, no service, dropped calls.
  lived in line of sight of 2 verizon towers.
  could go out into the yard and SEE them.
  sore recommedned buying an external antenna from a mall kiosak. =
brought it=20
  back to the store to make sure it was the one they recommended and was =
told=20
  then if I pluged it in woujld violate my warrenty. what a bunch of =
bull,=20
  since they recommended it to start with.

  switched to SPRINT and never looked back.
  occasionally have small problems with bilings but they get worked out, =
lots=20
  easier than they dia with verizon or at&t.




  mikeyhsd@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
    "SMS ???. ?" <scharf.steven@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message=20
  news:4755f2af$0$84232$742ec2ed@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
    -Verizon was #1 in 17 out of 20 markets surveyed (in 2 of those 17 =
they
    were tied with T-Mobile)

    -Alltel was #1 in 3 markets (Tampa, Cleveland, and Seattle)

    -Sprint was last in 19 out of 20 markets (AT&T was last in
    Minneapolis-Saint Paul, and Sprint was 2nd to last).

    I really thought that the declining number of AMPS handsets would =
hurt
    Verizon's ratings, but apparently that was not the case. Even with =
most
    users having digital-only phones, Verizon is still far better than =
AT&T,
    Sprint, or T-Mobile.

    I wonder how long Sprint can continue in business as an independent
    company. They have the worst coverage, a poor selection of handsets, =
and
    their Wi-Max plan has gone nowhere. Some say Verizon should acquire
    them, but I don't think that Verizon wants or needs them.=20


------=_NextPart_000_0561_01C8376A.29DD9E30
Content-Type: text/html;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=3DContent-Type content=3D"text/html; =
charset=3Diso-8859-1">
<META content=3D"MSHTML 6.00.6000.16546" name=3DGENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=3D#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>3 different phones in 4 months, same=20
situation.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>store manager lived in near by area and =
had same=20
problems.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>they kept promising to fix it by =
installing more=20
towers, for 0ver 1 year.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>am happy with sprint.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>even with the occasional =
burp.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV>
<P>&nbsp;</P>
<P><FONT color=3D#ff0000>
<MARQUEE scrollAmount=3D2 scrollDelay=3D9 behavior=3Dalternate =
width=3D"35%"=20
bgColor=3D#ffff00 height=3D22><A=20
href=3D"mailto:mikeyhsd@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
">mikeyhsd@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
></MARQUE=
E></FONT></P>
<P>&nbsp;</P></DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE=20
style=3D"PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; =
BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
  <DIV>"Cubit" &lt;<A href=3D"mailto:no@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
">no@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>&gt; =
wrote in=20
  message <A=20
  =
href=3D"news:DgA5j.75799$YL5.45395@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
">news:DgA5j=
..75799$YL5.45395@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>...</DIV>Sounds=20
  like you had a defective phone.&nbsp; If you could see the towers, an=20
  <BR>external antenna doesn't seem logical.<BR><BR><BR><BR>"mikeyhsd" =
&lt;<A=20
  href=3D"mailto:mikeyhsd@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
">mikeyhsd@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>&gt; =
wrote in=20
  message <BR><A=20
  =
href=3D"news:-9ednVIyBauRK8vanZ2dnUVZ_s6mnZ2d@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
">news:-9ednVIy=
BauRK8vanZ2dnUVZ_s6mnZ2d@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>...<BR>personally,=20
  dropped verizon at their encouragement the first day numbers =
<BR>became=20
  ****table in my area.<BR>poor service, no service, dropped =
calls.<BR>lived in=20
  line of sight of 2 verizon towers.<BR>could go out into the yard and =
SEE=20
  them.<BR>sore recommedned buying an external antenna from a mall =
kiosak.=20
  brought it <BR>back to the store to make sure it was the one they =
recommended=20
  and was told <BR>then if I pluged it in woujld violate my warrenty. =
what a=20
  bunch of bull, <BR>since they recommended it to start =
with.<BR><BR>switched to=20
  SPRINT and never looked back.<BR>occasionally have small problems with =
bilings=20
  but they get worked out, lots <BR>easier than they dia with verizon or =

  at&amp;t.<BR><BR><BR><BR><BR><A=20
  =
href=3D"mailto:mikeyhsd@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
">mikeyhsd@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
><BR><BR>=
<BR><BR>&nbsp;=20
  "SMS ???. ?" &lt;<A=20
  =
href=3D"mailto:scharf.steven@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
">scharf.steven@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>&g=
t;=20
  wrote in message <BR><A=20
  =
href=3D"news:4755f2af$0$84232$742ec2ed@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
">news:4755f2af$0$84=
232$742ec2ed@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>...<BR>&nbsp;=20
  -Verizon was #1 in 17 out of 20 markets surveyed (in 2 of those 17=20
  they<BR>&nbsp; were tied with T-Mobile)<BR><BR>&nbsp; -Alltel was #1 =
in 3=20
  markets (Tampa, Cleveland, and Seattle)<BR><BR>&nbsp; -Sprint was last =
in 19=20
  out of 20 markets (AT&amp;T was last in<BR>&nbsp; Minneapolis-Saint =
Paul, and=20
  Sprint was 2nd to last).<BR><BR>&nbsp; I really thought that the =
declining=20
  number of AMPS handsets would hurt<BR>&nbsp; Verizon's ratings, but =
apparently=20
  that was not the case. Even with most<BR>&nbsp; users having =
digital-only=20
  phones, Verizon is still far better than AT&amp;T,<BR>&nbsp; Sprint, =
or=20
  T-Mobile.<BR><BR>&nbsp; I wonder how long Sprint can continue in =
business as=20
  an independent<BR>&nbsp; company. They have the worst coverage, a poor =

  selection of handsets, and<BR>&nbsp; their Wi-Max plan has gone =
nowhere. Some=20
  say Verizon should acquire<BR>&nbsp; them, but I don't think that =
Verizon=20
  wants or needs them. <BR><BR></BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML>

------=_NextPart_000_0561_01C8376A.29DD9E30--
 




 31 Posts in Topic:
CR Survey of 48,000 cellular users
=?UTF-8?B?U01TIOaWr+iSgua  2007-12-04 16:39:04 
Re: CR Survey of 48,000 cellular users
"Cubit" <no@  2007-12-05 01:50:52 
Re: CR Survey of 48,000 cellular users
Kurt <labolide@[EMAIL   2007-12-04 18:06:56 
Re: CR Survey of 48,000 cellular users
clifto <clifto@[EMAIL   2007-12-04 20:16:14 
Re: CR Survey of 48,000 cellular users
"Cubit" <no@  2007-12-05 16:13:45 
Re: CR Survey of 48,000 cellular users
"LHA" <nobod  2007-12-05 08:59:37 
Re: CR Survey of 48,000 cellular users
=?UTF-8?B?U01TIOaWr+iSgua  2007-12-05 08:16:53 
Re: CR Survey of 48,000 cellular users
"Cubit" <no@  2007-12-05 16:16:44 
Re: CR Survey of 48,000 cellular users
"Joel Koltner"   2007-12-04 18:29:17 
Re: CR Survey of 48,000 cellular users
Ron <ron.clifford@[EMA  2007-12-05 14:40:29 
Re: CR Survey of 48,000 cellular users
"Joel Koltner"   2007-12-05 11:01:35 
Re: CR Survey of 48,000 cellular users
=?UTF-8?B?U01TIOaWr+iSgua  2007-12-05 12:01:30 
Re: CR Survey of 48,000 cellular users
=?UTF-8?B?U01TIOaWr+iSgua  2007-12-05 06:54:27 
Re: CR Survey of 48,000 cellular users
Todd Allcock <elecconn  2007-12-06 10:12:02 
Re: CR Survey of 48,000 cellular users
SMS <scharf.steven@[EM  2007-12-06 10:11:46 
Re: CR Survey of 48,000 cellular users
"mikeyhsd" <  2007-12-05 08:30:28 
Re: CR Survey of 48,000 cellular users
Larry <noone@[EMAIL PR  2007-12-05 14:41:08 
Re: CR Survey of 48,000 cellular users
Cellguy <cellguy@[EMAI  2007-12-05 20:34:25 
Re: CR Survey of 48,000 cellular users
Larry <noone@[EMAIL PR  2007-12-05 22:54:53 
Re: CR Survey of 48,000 cellular users
clifto <clifto@[EMAIL   2007-12-06 14:39:58 
Re: CR Survey of 48,000 cellular users
Larry <noone@[EMAIL PR  2007-12-06 23:27:43 
Re: CR Survey of 48,000 cellular users
DTC <me@[EMAIL PROTECT  2007-12-06 16:38:40 
Re: CR Survey of 48,000 cellular users
The Ghost of General Lee   2007-12-06 18:15:54 
Re: CR Survey of 48,000 cellular users
"Cubit" <no@  2007-12-05 16:24:03 
Re: CR Survey of 48,000 cellular users
"mikeyhsd" <  2007-12-05 18:10:48 
Re: CR Survey of 48,000 cellular users
Todd Allcock <elecconn  2007-12-05 13:27:17 
Re: CR Survey of 48,000 cellular users
me@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2007-12-05 23:45:05 
Re: CR Survey of 48,000 cellular users
"Ness-Net" <  2007-12-05 20:52:28 
Re: CR Survey of 48,000 cellular users
=?UTF-8?B?U01TIOaWr+iSgua  2007-12-05 21:13:44 
Re: CR Survey of 48,000 cellular users
arnstein@[EMAIL PROTECTED  2007-12-09 06:03:19 
Re: CR Survey of 48,000 cellular users
DTC <me@[EMAIL PROTECT  2007-12-09 00:14:08 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
localhost-V2008-12-19 Thu Jan 8 4:28:01 PST 2009.