On Wed, 12 Dec 2007 03:58:56 +0000, Larry <noone@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>"Claude S. Sutton, Jr"
><cssutto@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in
>news:slrnfluer3.an8.cssutto@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>> ["Followup-To:" header set to alt.cellular.alltel.]
>> On 2007-12-11, Nomen Nescio <nobody@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>> "AT&T, Verizon Wireless, and other big cellular carriers are
>dragging
>>> their feet on approving services that could compete with their
>own..."
>>>
>>> Business Week article: http://xrl.us/bcprt
>>>
>>
>> Gee whiz.
>>
>> Arn't they dumb.
>>
>> Why would anyone resist competition?
>>
>> CSSJR
>
>Yeah, but what this amounts to is Sutton Machine taking control
>of its customers' telephone systems and preventing the customers
>from calling YOUR competitors....See the point? Unfair practice,
>all the way.
As usual, a bull**** comparison. They aren't preventing them from
contacting Rebtel, they just aren't providing a short code to reach
them. This equates to VZW refusing to allow their customers to reach
Alltel by using 611. They still allow them to call the 800 number.
No unfair practices at all. Put your tin foil hat back on.
|
