Todd H. wrote:
> As for a cite, anyone who visited news.cnet.com today would've tripped
> over the headline:
>
>
http://www.news.com/Sprint-expected-to-undercut-rivals-call-plans/2100-1039_3-6231277.html?tag=nefd.top
Actually I saw the "$60-80" from
"http://www.forbes.com/feeds/ap/2008/02/20/ap4676170.html"
It's always amusing to see "he who must not be named" demanding
citations for widely disseminated news stories, while at the same time
never providing citations for any of the claims he makes up, and never
providing any factual basis for disputing any of the citations that
others make.
He's never provided a citation for extended GSM, despite repeated
requests.
He's never provided a citation disputing the accuracy of the network
quality surveys, despite repeated requests.
He's never provided a citation disputing the USA Today story that Apple
approached Verizon with the iPhone prior to going to Cingular/AT&T,
despite repeated requests.
He complains that people treat him badly, but if he would change his
behavior he would be forgiven and perhaps he could make some useful
contributions.
