I think you need to get your aluminum lined hat back on. The beams that MI5
uses to read minds had cooked yours.... well done
<fievmf@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message news:xg0711260830143968@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> MI5. Persecution Update: Friday 16 April, 1999
>
> If You Intend To. Reply, Please Read This
> Please.... keep your response to one. page!. Faxes over a page or two
will
> be deleted. without being read.
>
> BBC newscaster Nicholas Witchell cant. stop himself laughing
>
> During 1990-91 there were. very many instances of "interactive
> television" where newscasters. and other TV presenters saw on a screen
> before them what was happening in my home, and reacted,. frequently by
> laughing at me. During this. period I unfortunately did not record these
> programmes. For the last year or two, I. have been recording everything
I
> watch, and there has been a drastic. decrease in such incidents.
>
> However, on occasion, television presenters do. still engage in
> "interactive. watching" and react to what they see. This has been
evident
> with Jon Snow of Channel Four. News recently - a particularly
interesting
> case,. since it has been established that he cannot be corrupted by
money
> (it is well-do***ented that MI5. offered him a tax-free salary and he
> turned them down). I wonder what device MI5 are using to encourage him.
to
> do. the "interactive watching"?
>
> On. Saturday 10 April 1999 at 7pm, Nicholas Witchell on BBC2 News
reacted
> when he. saw that I was watching the programme, and I have his reactions
> stored safely on videotape. I have watched. this tape several times and
I
> am entirely confident that my evaluation of his reactions is correct..
For
> several minutes his upper lip quivered in mirth as he attempted to keep.
a
> straight face. Then. finally his self-control eva****ated through the
> excuse
> of a weak joke and. his face collapsed into a grin.
>
> The strange thing is that I dont know why he was laughing. at me, what I
> had done recently to "deserve" to be laughed at. The. MI5 persecutors
> usually manage to invent some justification as to why people should.
laugh
> at. and/or abuse me ("hes an X", "it was so funny" etc), so Mr Witchell
> could have been laughing for any number of reasons. Perhaps he found.
the
> views I have been expressing. in these articles amusing? I suppose if
> youre
> paid enough money and ordered to laugh then even the. most innocuous
thing
> becomes. funny.
>
> Jon Snow of Channel. Four News cant stop himself smirking, either.
>
> On 12 February 1999 I was watching Channel Four. News presented by Jon
> Snow. As usual, I was recording the programme, so that if anything out.
of
> the ordinary happened, Id be able to. go back and watch it again.
>
> Now, Jon Snow, by his own claim,. is uncorruptible. He says he turned
down
> an offer of a substantial. tax-free salary from MI5 - they wanted to
make
> him their mouthpiece, and he told. them where to get off.
>
> So you will be most. surprised to learn that Jon Snow "interactively
> watched" me that evening, and on. many other evenings. Approximately
> fifteen. minutes into the programme, he announced that the US President
> would be making a live appearance at about. 7.30pm; I looked at the
clock
> on the mantelpiece;. and Snow saw me looking at the clock, and visibly
> tried to suppress a. smirk.
>
> Uncorruptible, are. you, Mister Snow? If not money, then why are you
> watching me,. Mister Snow? Are they forcing you to watch me? Cant you
turn
> the monitor off,. Mister Snow?
>
> Keith Hill MP (Labour - Streatham), my elected. representative, as ever
> refuses. to help.
>
> Comparing the MI5 Persecution with. German "Final Solution"
>
> It might seem offensive to compare. the mass murder of millions of
> civilians in wartime. with the peacetime persecution of merely one
> person. Yet the comparison has been coursing through my. mind for
several
> years now, because the brutality. of German intent to "sub-humans" is
very
> much comparable to the brutality of British intent to. someone they
> vituperate and term. "not up to British standards". The methods may
> differ,
> but. the persecutors mindset is the same.
>
> The Germans first targeted the mentally disabled,. too
>
> During WW2 millions. of ethnic Russians, Poles, Jews, mentally ill,
> gypsies
> and other minorities were rounded up. and murdered in purpose-built
camps
> by the German regime, in. the name of "racial superiority". Fifty years
> on,
> the British Secret Police, MI5, instituted a. campaign of mass
> hysteria; but in their cowardice, limited their. activities to one
single
> victim.
>
> It is instructive to note that. the early German "cleansing" effort was
> directed primarily not at Jews, but at the. mentally ill. The Nazis set
up
> the T4. project in the thirties to "cleanse" away 70,000 mentally
disabled
> people, including schizophrenics and epileptics. After. WW2 the Jews
with
> their media influence used the reaction from the holocaust to. roll back
> anti-semitism in the. Western countries; however, the mentally ill are
> today still a persecuted group in the modern Western world. as they were
> under the Nazis (the current Jewish home secretary in the UK. intends to
> bring in laws for incarceration without any criminal. charge for some
> mentally ill people - he protects his own minority,. but does nothing
for
> the other minorities in todays. society), and this continuing bias forms
a
> central cause for the current acts of persecution in. the UK.
>
> Widespread knowledge of what. is happening to the "un-British" minority
>
> In both the German persecution of the thirties and. early forties, and
the
> current British persecution, many,. many people are well aware of whats
> happening.. There is widespread complicity through inaction of
> populace; and in a. substantial pro****tion of the mainstread population,
> the persecution. had/has widespread enthusiastic sup****t; yet in both
the
> German case in. the 1940s and the British today, the existence of
> persecution is a mass. secret which must be never admitted out loud. In
> the
> recent Lawrence case this. "secret bigotry" has been termed
> "institutionalised racism",. and that is a very good word for what the
> British are doing today The. persecutory attitudes and omerta regarding
> them are so deeply ingrained in the. national psyche that they define
the
> national. mood
>
> During WW2 many Germans knew minorities were disappearing,. and through
> inaction quietly condoned. their government's mass murder of
> "un-German" minorities and. inferior "foreigners"; and in the 1990s,
> similarly, many English people know what the MI5. British Secret Police
> have been doing, and not. only condone it, but actively take part,
because
> of xenophobia. against the "un-British" unit minority that is the target
> of
> "British". actions. This attitude by the British persecutors has been
made
> explicit through the words "he's not up. to British standards"; the
> British
> seem to have found their. very own "untermenschen" to victimise.
>
> Why these obsessive. "holy wars" happen
>
> This type of aggression occurs when the. majority is threatened or
> humiliated in some way, economically, militarily. or culturally. In
> pre-WW2
> Germany. the threat was primarily economic and military, following
> Germany's humiliating defeat in the. first world war and the reparations
> it
> was forced to pay. In modern Britain,. one might guess that the majority
> English who are behind. the persecution feel pressured by the swiftly
> dimini****ng. status of Britain in the world, and the rapidly increasing
> coloured colonisation. of their country, which in time will see the
ethnic
> English a minority in their own land, and their. more antisocial
elements,
> unable to reply to the obvious threat, instead. project their aggression
> onto. another, weaker, unit minority
>
> In both. cases there is a whiff of "holy war" or irrational obsession
with
> the persecution. Certainly. the German behaviour fifty years ago
bordered
> on the not-quite-sane, and the current. British behaviour towards their
> chosen. victim is strongly tinged with a leave-taking of reason. And the
> choices open to the victims are the same,. since MI5 will never allow me
> to
> escape them, "if he tries to run away we'll. find him", just like the
> commandant of Auschwitz telling the new arrivals, "the only escape. is
> through. the chimney".
>
> The Victim Will Destroy Us if. We Dont Destroy Him First
>
>The persecutors propaganda is the same. Fifty. years ago the Germans
said,
> "if we don't do it to the Jews then the Jews will do it to. us"; and
MI5's
> propaganda in the early nineties concentrated on. their victim as a
> "monster" aesome "untermenschen". minority.
>
> "We are decent fellows" say the. Brutal Persecutors
>
> During the course of. researching this article I read part of the very
> interesting book, "Hitler - A Study. in Tyranny", by Alan Bullock. This
> volume contains a quote from Himmler on. the "Final Solution";
>
> "Most of you know what. it means when a hundred corpses are lying side
by
> side, or five hundred or one thousand. To have stuck it out,. and at the
> same time .... to have remained decent fellows,. that is what has made
us
> hard. This is a page of glory in. our history which has never been
written
> and is. never to be written."
>
> In the MI5 persecution, too, there is a. thread of deliberate brutality
to
> the sick and vulnerable, while the persecutors. maintain that "we are
> decent fellows". There is almost. a conscious schizophrenia in the
> self-attitudes. of the Security Service operatives and those in the
public
> who they. employ against me, which reflects the contradiction evident in
> the German attitude above. On the one hand, they stoop to. the lowest
and
> most base behaviour; yet at the same. time, the MI5 operatives tell
> themselves that since. they are civilised British people, then surely
they
> must by definition be "decent fellows". Any indecency is made the fault.
> of
> the. victim; "hes making us persecute him, so we need feel no guilt".
>
> Yet the conduct is atypical of the way these peoples. see their normal
> modes of behaviour.. Befslaughter was not typical of normal German
> behaviour up to that point. Similarly, the. current MI5 abuse goes
against
> the grain of British self-image. as being "reserved" and "decent", since
> they are using terms of abuse. which are common among blacks and other
> supposedly less-developed races, but not among the. English.
>
> Conclusion
>
> The ultimate aim of both persecutions is the. humiliation and physical
> extinction of the persecuted group.. The Germans did this in a very
direct
> way; the. British Secret Police MI5 are acting indirectly and relying on
> self-extinction of their. target, because in peacetime and in the
current
> somewhat false climate of "political correctness". more direct methods
are
> impossible. If MI5. undertook more direct action the mass "omerta" would
> be
> broken.
>
> I. have written this article with sincerity to show how a historically
> recent persecution in another country parallels. what is being done in
> this
> country today. In both cases, the. evil-doers are of their countries
> establishments, and. rely on widespread tacit sup****t to maintain the
> persecution and. omerta around it. While the holocaust was undoubtedly
the
> greater. evil, it is im****tant to be aware of the fact that had the
> Germans
> not been defeated fifty. years ago, their plans would have gone through
to
> total completion.. In Britain today no force threatens the "permanent
> government" of which the Security Service. forms a part; and it looks
very
> unlikely that the. wrongs perpetrated by the MI5 secret police will ever
> be
> revealed to public view, and the British secret state brought. to
justice
> for. its evil actions.
>
> 57
>
|
