by John Navas <spamfilter0@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
Sep 21, 2005 at 08:51 AM
[POSTED TO alt.cellular.cingular - REPLY ON USENET PLEASE]
In <4C_Xe.525113$5V4.427282@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> on Tue, 20 Sep 2005 20:50:08 GMT,
"kr0"
<kentr0ss@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>Apparently there is an issue in California with a number of cellular
service
>providers selling cell phones advertised to have bluetooth functions that
do
>not. The main phone in question seems to be the Motorola V710. If you go
to
>https://www.lawyersandsettlements.com/case/alltel_bluetooth_cell_phone_misrepresentation
>there is more information on this and what can be done about it. There is
>also a free case evaluation provided for those who might have purchased
such
>a phone expecting bluetooth functionality. I hope that this may be of
some
>help.
This is a silly, frivolous "issue" that will just enrich lawyers at the
expense of consumers.
--
Best regards, HELP FOR CINGULAR GSM & SONY ERICSSON PHONES:
John Navas <http://navasgrp.home.att.net/#Cingular>
