by "EP" <Reply in the groups@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
May 23, 2006 at 10:14 AM
Typical cor****tate mouthpiece response. Go back in your cubicle and let us
live our lives.
"John Navas" <spamfilter0@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
news:Ba9Ye.64405$qY1.20605@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [POSTED TO alt.cellular.cingular - REPLY ON USENET PLEASE]
>
> In <4C_Xe.525113$5V4.427282@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> on Tue, 20 Sep 2005 20:50:08 GMT,
"kr0"
> <kentr0ss@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
> >Apparently there is an issue in California with a number of cellular
service
> >providers selling cell phones advertised to have bluetooth functions
that
do
> >not. The main phone in question seems to be the Motorola V710. If you
go
to
>
>https://www.lawyersandsettlements.com/case/alltel_bluetooth_cell_phone_misr
epresentation
> >there is more information on this and what can be done about it. There
is
> >also a free case evaluation provided for those who might have purchased
such
> >a phone expecting bluetooth functionality. I hope that this may be of
some
> >help.
>
> This is a silly, frivolous "issue" that will just enrich lawyers at the
> expense of consumers.
>
> --
> Best regards, HELP FOR CINGULAR GSM & SONY ERICSSON PHONES:
> John Navas <http://navasgrp.home.att.net/#Cingular>
