Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Electronic Equipment > Cellular Data > REPOST: Questi...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 1 of 4 Topic 438 of 513
Post > Topic >>

REPOST: Question about Downloading Web Data

by "Al" <alrosenfeld@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Feb 13, 2007 at 01:53 PM

I originally posted this to
alt.cellular.motorola,alt.cellular,alt.cellular.data, but had some
additional questions, and I also wanted to cross-post this to uk.=AD
telecom.=ADmobile, which I missed the first time through.  I hope I
haven't violated any Usenet Groups etiquette:

---------------------------------------------------------------------------=
---------------------------------------------------------------------------=
------------

Should the download size, measured in KBs, of a downloaded Web page
be
the same regardless of the carrier and cellular phone model used?

During a trip to Israel in November 2006, I rented Motorola i760
phones from Amigo, which provides cellular service through MIRS
Communication Ltd, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Motorola Israel. We
were quite pleased with the quality of service and the coverage
provided.


Unfortunately, I just received a bill from Amigo, which charged me an
astronomical amount for Web surfing (yeah, call me a junkie, as does
my wife, along with some other choice names).  At my request, I
received a detail for the data charges, which indicates that each
visited Web page equaled exactly 4KB of data.  Most of my browsing
was
BBC-Mobile News, where the standard format is primarily text, with
maybe a tiny graphic.  I was not downloading music or video files.


I used my US cellular phone -- a Samsung A707 Sync, with service
provided by Cingular -- to download many of the same (or similar)
pages as listed on Amigo's detail, and my phone indicated that these
pages seemed to average around 1300-1500 bytes, less than half what
MIRS/Amigo claimed.


Is it possible that the size of the same (or similar) Web page could
vary so much between carriers and cell phone models?  If not, I think
MIRS or Amigo may be engaging in some questionable billing practices.


Thanks in advance.


Al

---------------------------------------------------------------------------=
---------------------------------------------------------------------------=
------------

John Navas was kind enough to reply:

> >Should the download size, measured in KBs, of a downloaded Web page be
> >the same regardless of the carrier and cellular phone model used?
>
> Not necessarily -- web page size can be affected by proxy servers, some
> of which can reduce size by higher compression of images, etc.  Other
> proxies might increase size.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------=
---------------------------------------------------------------------------=
------------

A few additional questions related to my billing dispute with MIRS/
Amigo:

1=2E  The phone I used in Israel, a Motorla i760, included the following
specs:

     * Maximum WML Deck Size: 3K.  Does that mean the phone's Web
browser -- OpenWave V7.0.2 -- would   not have been capable of
downloading pages as large as 4KB?  In WAP terminology, isn't Deck
Size the same as Page Size in HTML terms?

    *  Memory Cache Size:  60K.  I was charged for multiple views of
the same Web page, frequently within moments of each other, and I know
that I didn't reload those pages.  Since this phone has cache,
wouldn't it have just re-displayed those pages stored in its memory
without downloading new versions?  All the pages I viewed were static
and wouldn't have required updates from the server.

2=2E  I understand Mr. Navas's point about the effect of proxy servers,
but could the size of downloaded pages really have been doubled or
trebled from an observed 1500 bytes to a claimed 4KB, thanks to the
carrier's network?  I find that sort of inflation beyond belief.
Other than fleecing consumers, where is the valued added by doing
that?  Incidentally, many of the pages that I downloaded were from BBC-
Mobile News, which states in its FAQ that its typical three-page new
story totals about 5KB (assuming I did my math correctly), meaning
that a single page should be about 1.7KB, about a third of what MIRS/
Amigo claims.

Can someone help me sort through all this confusion?

Thanks.



Alan


PS.  This dispute is not a minor issue to me, as MIRS/Amigo claims I
downloaded over 600 Web pages and other "stuff" (files with suffixes
CSS, WBMP, WML, GIF, and JPG), for a total of over 2700KB.  At its
advertised download rate of US$.09 per KB, that comes to a not
insignificant US$240, give or take a few bucks.
 




 4 Posts in Topic:
REPOST: Question about Downloading Web Data
"Al" <alrose  2007-02-13 13:53:44 
Re: REPOST: Question about Downloading Web Data
Todd Allcock <elecconn  2007-02-17 01:24:27 
Re: REPOST: Question about Downloading Web Data
Larry <noone@[EMAIL PR  2007-02-17 22:29:12 
Re: REPOST: Question about Downloading Web Data
John Navas <spamfilter  2007-03-05 04:20:18 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Fri Dec 5 5:26:43 CST 2008.