Re: A bad experience dealing with AT&T Wireless

On May 10, 11:38 am, "Pangloss" <optimist@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> "George Grapman" <sfgeo...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>
> news:njjVj.81$hJ5.59@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>
> > LDC wrote:
> >> On Sat, 10 May 2008 08:22:45 -0400, "Pangloss" <optimist@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> >> wrote:
>
> >>>> *Sigh*  AT&T did NOT "buy out" Cingular.  Cingular's parent
company,
> >>>> SBC
> >>>> (Southwestern Bell) bought (what was left of) AT&T,and renamed
> >>>> themselves
> >>>> and their "Cingular" wireless divison, to "AT&T" for the name-brand
> >>>> recognition.
> >>> Actually they bought BellSouth which owned Cingular...
>
> >> That is partially correct but misleading.  SBC was an owner of
> >> Cingular since its inception.  It was a joint venture between SBC
> >> and Bell South.  When SBC bought Bell South they became the sole
> >> owner of Cingular.
>
> >   Cingular was originally AT&T wireless. The name changed when it was
sold
> > to SBC and Bell South and we have now come full circle except for the
fact
> > that AT&T is AT&T in name only.
>
> Yup, in 20 years we've gone from "ATT" through seven baby bells right on
> back to "att"....Karma I suppose....
>
> I wonder how much the logo design firm was paid who told them go from
all
> CAPS to lower case?

Except now the HQ is in Texas, and we all know how well Texans can
manage large organizations...hint $4 gas...JG