Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Electronic Equipment > Analog VLSI > Weird problem w...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 1 of 11 Topic 114 of 140
Post > Topic >>

Weird problem with Samsung 950p monitor; LG or Niewsonic: which?

by Yugo <nobody@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Jun 10, 2006 at 04:18 PM

After only 4 years, my Samsung 950p gave up (I bought it as an end of line 
model.) For no apparent reason, sometimes the sides wobble, and then, from

the center towards top and bottom, the screen gets fuzzy. If I change 
screen resolution, it's OK. Then, it gets fuzzy and I must change 
resolution again. Etc. Samsung suggested that they maybe could fix the 
problem for close to the price of a new 19" CRT monitor. Without the 
guarantee, of course.

Sometimes the screen is absolutely perfect for an hour or two, so I doubt 
it's a big problem but, for a lack of service at a decent price on CRT 
monitors, it seems I'll have to scrap it, unless you can give me an idea 
of the problem. If it's apparently not a major problem, maybe I could get 
somebody to take a look. If not, I'll have to go for a LCD, though I'm 
less than enchanted by the technology.

I'm considering 2 LCD monitors. The one that best fits my needs -- 
writing, browsing the net, looking at pictures, DVDs (well, maybe one day)

-- would be a LG L1952T, also sometimes refered to as L1952TX, apparently.

300 cd/m2, contrast 1400:1, DVI-I (standard DVI, I suppose?), 8ms. Picture

quality seems OK. Price: $289 CAN.

The Viewsonic VX922, is less bright (270 cd/m2), the contrast is not quite

as good (700:1, if I remember well), but it's a 2ms, a monitor for gamers.

  Accordingly, it's $50 more expensive: $339 CAN.

Salesman ALL tell me that I'd be much better off with the Viewsonic. They 
tell me that the Viewsonic quality is much better. The VX922 looks like a 
hot seller for Viewsonic, so maybe the price is set a bit lower than for 
other models.

A friend, who knows more about electronics than I, told me that, besides 
pixels dying, the main problem with LCDs is screen fade out. So, unless 
Viewsonic's pretention that their light source has a 40,000 hrs long life 
(other models have a 50,000 hour life expectancy, though) I suppose I'd 
theoretically be better off with the LG.

But I'm not a gamer and never will be. My feeling with LG sup****t is not 
very good: they don't even have an 800 number for sup****t!

What is your experience with both Viewsonic and LG? Which monitor would 
you go for?
 




 11 Posts in Topic:
Weird problem with Samsung 950p monitor; LG or Niewsonic: which?
Yugo <nobody@[EMAIL PR  2006-06-10 16:18:12 
Re: Weird problem with Samsung 950p monitor; LG or Niewsonic: wh
Yugo <nobody@[EMAIL PR  2006-06-10 20:39:34 
Re: Weird problem with Samsung 950p monitor; LG or Niewsonic: wh
"JANA" <jana  2006-06-10 22:24:28 
Re: Weird problem with Samsung 950p monitor; LG or Niewsonic: wh
"Michael A. Terrell&  2006-06-11 03:06:51 
Re: Weird problem with Samsung 950p monitor; LG or Niewsonic: wh
Yugo <nobody@[EMAIL PR  2006-06-11 15:23:11 
Re: Weird problem with Samsung 950p monitor; LG or Niewsonic: wh
Jasen Betts <jasen@[EM  2006-06-11 02:04:06 
Re: Weird problem with Samsung 950p monitor; LG or Niewsonic: wh
Yugo <nobody@[EMAIL PR  2006-06-11 15:29:45 
Re: Weird problem with Samsung 950p monitor; LG or Niewsonic: wh
Jasen Betts <jasen@[EM  2006-06-12 11:31:14 
Re: Weird problem with Samsung 950p monitor; LG or Niewsonic: wh
Yugo <nobody@[EMAIL PR  2006-06-12 13:21:52 
Re: Weird problem with Samsung 950p monitor; LG or Niewsonic: wh
Terry Given <my_name@[  2006-06-13 10:46:00 
Re: Weird problem with Samsung 950p monitor; LG or Niewsonic: wh
"gazza" <bus  2006-06-15 03:32:53 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Fri Aug 29 0:56:24 CDT 2008.