Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Electronic Equipment > Microcontrollers 8bit > Re: woot: ROM ...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 7 of 10 Topic 818 of 862
Post > Topic >>

Re: woot: ROM tradgedy revisited

by "robb" <some@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Jan 11, 2008 at 09:08 PM

"Eric Smith" <eric@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
news:m3wsqfq0s9.fsf@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> robb wrote:
> > - both (OE) and (CE) work as surogate latch but which is
better
> > choice ?
>
> Impossible to say without knowing the relative timing.  Use a
dual-trace
> scope, trigger on OE, and look at address lines (one at a time)
on other
> trace.  Make sure there seems to be enough setup time from
address valid
> to the edge of OE.  In other words, the scope trace for the
address line
> shouldn't show any transitions for perhaps 20 ns before the
edge of OE.
> (Look up the required address setup time in the data sheet.)
>
> Then try the same experiment for CE.
>
> If they both show sufficient set up time, it doesn't matter,
but I'd
> choose the one that shows more.

hello Eric,

Thanks for reply,

OE shows the most delay before falling edge  *BUT* that fall
occurs way ou ther about halfway accross/between  the
Address/Data transitions which are maybe 150 ns wide.

CE drops about a fraction after the Address transition.

I will double check that to make sure i am being accurate but
that is my memory at the moment.

thanksfor help, ill  double check,
robb
 




 10 Posts in Topic:
woot: ROM tradgedy revisited
"robb" <some  2008-01-10 07:26:01 
Re: woot: ROM tradgedy revisited
Ian Malcolm <valid.add  2008-01-10 23:58:31 
Re: ROM tradgedy revisited (was: microcontroller ROM copy troub
"robb" <some  2008-01-11 11:01:13 
Re: woot: ROM tradgedy revisited
rebel <me@[EMAIL PROTE  2008-01-12 08:46:17 
Re: woot: ROM tradgedy revisited
Lostgallifreyan <no-on  2008-01-12 00:25:37 
Re: woot: ROM tradgedy revisited
Eric Smith <eric@[EMAI  2008-01-11 17:40:22 
Re: woot: ROM tradgedy revisited
"robb" <some  2008-01-11 21:08:14 
Re: woot: ROM tradgedy revisited
Ian Malcolm <valid.add  2008-01-12 03:40:55 
Re: woot: ROM tradgedy revisited (REPOST)
Ian Malcolm <valid.add  2008-01-12 03:49:35 
Re: woot: ROM tradgedy revisited (REPOST)
Ian Malcolm <valid.add  2008-01-12 03:52:46 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Thu Nov 20 19:17:09 CST 2008.