Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Electronic Equipment > Embedded > NAND flash mise...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 1 of 30 Topic 12439 of 13381
Post > Topic >>

NAND flash misery

by Vladimir Vassilevsky <antispam_bogus@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Jun 27, 2008 at 11:10 AM

Guess how many bad blocks are typical for NAND flash of several GB 
capacity? As many as 2 percent! There could be the whole areas of 
hundreds of megabytes of the contiguous bad cells, as well as the random 
scatter.

It is possible to do the extensive read/write test to find the most of 
the unreliable blocks; but it takes many hours.

I didn't encounter this problem until we started to use the high 
capacity CF cards. The bad blocks were very rare for the cards of 1GB 
and below. Since the flash iself is hidden behind the IDE interface and 
a compatible file system, and the read/write performance is critical, it 
is generally impossible to apply an error correction scheme.

I was under impression that flash is more reliable then HDD; now I see 
that it is not so. Do you know how reliable are the IDE flash drives?


Vladimir Vassilevsky
DSP and Mixed Signal Design Consultant
http://www.abvolt.com
 




 30 Posts in Topic:
NAND flash misery
Vladimir Vassilevsky <  2008-06-27 11:10:29 
Re: NAND flash misery
Didi <dp@[EMAIL PROTEC  2008-06-27 09:29:32 
Re: NAND flash misery
cs_posting@[EMAIL PROTECT  2008-06-27 09:59:20 
Re: NAND flash misery
Jim Stewart <jstewart@  2008-06-27 11:35:09 
Re: NAND flash misery
Dombo <dombo@[EMAIL PR  2008-06-28 11:48:26 
Re: NAND flash misery
Didi <dp@[EMAIL PROTEC  2008-06-28 13:12:37 
Re: NAND flash misery
David Brown <david@[EM  2008-06-29 13:04:21 
Re: NAND flash misery
"Vladimir Vassilevsk  2008-06-29 09:19:32 
Re: NAND flash misery
David Brown <david@[EM  2008-06-29 17:59:03 
Re: NAND flash misery
Vladimir Vassilevsky <  2008-06-29 12:02:21 
Re: NAND flash misery
Dombo <dombo@[EMAIL PR  2008-06-30 11:59:25 
Re: NAND flash misery
cs_posting@[EMAIL PROTECT  2008-06-27 09:55:33 
Re: NAND flash misery
Vladimir Vassilevsky <  2008-06-27 12:10:17 
Re: NAND flash misery
John Devereux <jdREMOV  2008-06-27 18:37:30 
Re: NAND flash misery
"robertwessel2@[EMAI  2008-06-27 14:56:37 
Re: NAND flash misery
David Brown <david@[EM  2008-06-28 12:28:18 
Re: NAND flash misery
"Vladimir Vassilevsk  2008-06-28 08:09:06 
Re: NAND flash misery
David Brown <david@[EM  2008-06-28 18:08:48 
Re: NAND flash misery
Stefan Reuther <stefan  2008-06-29 23:18:37 
Re: NAND flash misery
Vladimir Vassilevsky <  2008-06-29 17:01:04 
Re: NAND flash misery
Stefan Reuther <stefan  2008-06-30 20:13:53 
Re: NAND flash misery
Dombo <dombo@[EMAIL PR  2008-06-30 11:55:13 
Re: NAND flash misery
cs_posting@[EMAIL PROTECT  2008-06-30 12:34:33 
Re: NAND flash misery
msg <msg@[EMAIL PROTEC  2008-07-07 09:17:31 
Re: NAND flash misery
David Brown <david.bro  2008-07-07 20:37:29 
Re: NAND flash misery
Habib Bouaziz-Viallet <  2008-06-29 06:39:32 
Re: NAND flash misery
"Vladimir Vassilevsk  2008-06-29 09:53:28 
Re: NAND flash misery
dalai lamah <antonio12  2008-06-29 15:06:25 
Re: NAND flash misery
Habib Bouaziz-Viallet <  2008-07-01 18:15:02 
Re: NAND flash misery
Vladimir Vassilevsky <  2008-07-01 18:02:45 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Mon Dec 1 17:04:44 CST 2008.