Re: Complex to 2x real - how?

cs_posting@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 writes:

> On Oct 10, 11:44 am, Randy Yates <ya...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>> > This doesn't invert the spectrum, it merely ****fts it linearly up in
>> > frequency.
>>
>> That's what I meant. "Invert" may not have been the best term for this
>> process, but my point still remains: it moves stuff around. For
example,
>> DC is no longer DC.
>
> Indeed it ****fts it, but as proposed it ****fts it without spectral
> inversion.
>
> That's more than just word games, because it's also trivial to
> implement it in a way that DOES result in spectral inversion.   In
> fact it's quite easy to do accidentally... just swap I and Q.

I am aware of the definition of "inversion" that refers to spectral
inversion, but I think that most people here can understand the
difference in semantics. There are exceptions, of course.
-- 
%  Randy Yates                  % "She tells me that she likes me very
much,
%% Fuquay-Varina, NC            %     but when I try to touch, she makes
it
%%% 919-577-9882                %                            all too
clear."
%%%% <yates@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>           %        'Yours Truly, 2095', *Time*, ELO 

http://www.digitalsignallabs.com