Re: Complex to 2x real - how?

On Oct 10, 11:53 am, Randy Yates <ya...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:

> I am aware of the definition of "inversion" that refers to spectral
> inversion, but I think that most people here can understand the
> difference in semantics. There are exceptions, of course.

But your original statement was:

"The bad thing about this approach is that it inverts
the spectrum, as seen by the step 2 explanation. "

And that is entirely false.

The system could trivially be made to to do as you suggested it would,
but as described it does not.