Re: Complex to 2x real - how?

Randy Yates <yates@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> writes:

> dotter <dotter@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> writes:
>> [...]
>> Given the architecture of the device and various FPGA implmentations,
>> interpolation seems unlikely and more likely to be some cleverness
>> though I wonder if this is in the implementation space rather than
>> signal processing.
>
> If you simply take the real component and stuff zeros in every
> other sample to upsample to 2*Fs, you've got what's advertised,
> although without the "inversion". That is, you'll have a real signal
> that has the original content from 0 to Fs / 2 preserved in 0 to Fs / 2
> of the new signal, and the original content from -Fs / 2 to 0 preserved
> in Fs / 2 to Fs. Since the new sample rate is 2 * Fs, Fs is the highest
> frequency at the output rate. 

Err, no, this is wrong. Sorry - please ignore.
-- 
%  Randy Yates                  % "She tells me that she likes me very
much,
%% Fuquay-Varina, NC            %     but when I try to touch, she makes
it
%%% 919-577-9882                %                            all too
clear."
%%%% <yates@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>           %        'Yours Truly, 2095', *Time*, ELO 

http://www.digitalsignallabs.com