Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Electronic Equipment > Digital Signal Processing (DSP) > Re: The best tr...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 2 of 2 Topic 14038 of 14333
Post > Topic >>

Re: The best trade-off between input data and coefficient dimension

by yongzhi.liu@[EMAIL PROTECTED] Oct 12, 2008 at 07:06 PM

I don't understand what '14 bit added precision' mean. Suppose the
output of FIR, x[i], is in ac***ulator, in 1.31 format, you could
Equation: y[i] = b[0]x[i] + b[1]y[i-1] + b[2]y[i-2]
Format : b[1,2] -> Q3.13, y[i] -> Q1.15, x[i] -> Q1.31
1) on b[0]x[i], ****ft x[i] to Q3.28, store them outside ac***ulator
2) calculate b[1]y[i-1] + b[2]y[i-2], results are in ac***ulator
3) calculate y[i] in ac***ulator by loading 1) output, perform double
precision addition
4) ****ft y[i] to Q1.15 and be prepared for next iteration.

You could improve accuracy by putting more calculation in ac***ulator.

Liu
 




 2 Posts in Topic:
The best trade-off between input data and coefficient dimension
"androjoker" &l  2008-10-11 18:03:36 
Re: The best trade-off between input data and coefficient dimens
yongzhi.liu@[EMAIL PROTEC  2008-10-12 19:06:35 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Tue Dec 2 6:06:31 CST 2008.