Re: "Discrete Hartley transform" vs " Discrete Fouuier transform"

On Tue, 21 Oct 2008 16:11:32 -0700 (PDT), "Steven G. Johnson"
<stevenj@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:

>On Oct 21, 4:46 pm, Eric Jacobsen <eric.jacob...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>> The big issue seems to be that I don't have a specific set of
>> constraints to cite where a measurable "advantage" can be
>> demonstrated.   That's correct, I don't.  
>
>Yup, that is the big issue - you have no evidence for your claims, or
>even a concrete description of where a performance/memory advantage
>*might* come from.  Since you concede that, and just want to say that
>the transforms aren't *exactly* the same, so there might somehow be
>some performance advantage somewhere (perhaps on hardware powered by
>unicorns), then I'm happy to conclude the discussion.
>
>Steven

Did you think I was ever saying something different than that?   Well,
not the unicorn part. 

If you didn't disagree with that from the beginning you could have
easily cleared it up the several times I asked you to clarify your
position.

Eric Jacobsen
Minister of Algorithms
Abineau Communications
http://www.ericjacobsen.org

Blog: http://www.dsprelated.com/blogs-1/hf/Eric_Jacobsen.php