On Jun 23, 10:52 am, "ALu...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
" <ALu...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> Hi KJ,
>
> I tried different Synplify / SynplifyPro versions. None of them
> complains about the not locally static expression.
>
But that does not mean that Synplify is correct in their
interpretation. I think Andy is correct, if you want another opinion
outside of the newsgroup by the experts that have their LRMs in hand
you can also try...
http://www.eda-stds.org/vasg/bugrep.htm#bugrepform
What is says there is...
"If you're experiencing a problem, issue, ambiguity or inconsistent
treatment of VHDL by different vendors which may be due to a language
issue, please fill out and submit the following issue re****t form."
I think I got an answer back in about a day or so on something I asked
about a long while back.
In any case, as a way to get going, follow Andy's suggestion. To
contribute to trying to improve whichever tool is not compliant though
you should also take Andy's advice about submitting a bug re****t to
the offending vendor. Having the backing of the experts at eda-
stds.org/vasg on which tool is wrong will give you some more clout.
Keeping the vendors honest in their interpretation of the language is
partly the users job as well.
Kevin Jennings
|
