Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Electronic Equipment > PC Hardware Chips > 45nm Penryn (Co...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 1 of 2 Topic 2675 of 2798
Post > Topic >>

45nm Penryn (Core2Quad) hit by erratum too

by Yousuf Khan <bbbl67@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Dec 7, 2007 at 09:45 PM

I couldn't believe my eyes, but the articles seem almost identical, you 
just substitute Intel for AMD, Penryn for Phenom, etc. And you get the 
same reaction and effect.

45nm Core 2 Quad launch delayed due to erratum? - The Tech Re****t
http://www.techre****t.com/discussions.x/13756

> 45nm Core 2 Quad launch delayed due to erratum?
> by Cyril Kowaliski — 12:37 PM on December 7, 2007
> 
> Processor bugs, or errata, seem to be an epidemic lately. After AMD's
erratum number 298 found its way onto all quad-core Opterons and Phenoms,
word is now going around that Intel has also found a bug in its upcoming
45nm Core 2 Quad processors, causing it to postpone the chips. French
enthusiast site Hardware.fr has the skinny:
> 
>     According to our sources, dual-core Penryn processors (code-named
Wolfdale) will indeed launch in mid-January, but quad-core versions
(code-named Yorkfield) won't become available until late February/early
March. Behind this delay lies a bug that, in some very rare cases, could
cause a system to crash. Although the bug has only been detected in the
lab through a new validation procedure, Intel has decided to fix it before
the chips' launch. 
> 
> Hardware.fr goes on to say that Intel's recently launched 45nm Core 2
Extreme QX9650—which is still up for sale—is also hit by the bug. However,
quad-core 45nm Xeons re****tedly aren't affected.
> 
> We asked Intel to comment and received this response from the company's
PR manager, Dan Snyder:
> 
>     45nm Core 2 Quad launch is planned for Q1'08, and we are still on
track for that. We can't comment on web speculation. 
> 
> The late February/early March schedule mentioned by Hardware.fr is a far
cry from the January 20 date that's been quoted on other sites, but it
still fits within Snyder's Q1 2008 time frame. If Hardware.fr is right and
the chips have indeed been postponed, though, that could give AMD enough
time to prep for Intel's 45nm assault by rolling out bug-free, B3 revision
Phenoms and introducing models with higher clock speeds. (Thanks to TR
reader Flying Fox for the tip.)
 




 2 Posts in Topic:
45nm Penryn (Core2Quad) hit by erratum too
Yousuf Khan <bbbl67@[E  2007-12-07 21:45:07 
Re: 45nm Penryn (Core2Quad) hit by erratum too
johannes <johs@[EMAIL   2007-12-25 12:00:33 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Sun Nov 23 11:26:01 CST 2008.