Talk About Network

Google





Electronic Equipment > PC Hardware Chips > Re: 45nm Penryn...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 2 of 2 Topic 2675 of 2812
Post > Topic >>

Re: 45nm Penryn (Core2Quad) hit by erratum too

by johannes <johs@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Dec 25, 2007 at 12:00 PM

Yousuf Khan wrote:
> 
> I couldn't believe my eyes, but the articles seem almost identical, you
> just substitute Intel for AMD, Penryn for Phenom, etc. And you get the
> same reaction and effect.

But it makes a huge difference whether the bug is found before or after
the
launch.
 




 2 Posts in Topic:
45nm Penryn (Core2Quad) hit by erratum too
Yousuf Khan <bbbl67@[E  2007-12-07 21:45:07 
Re: 45nm Penryn (Core2Quad) hit by erratum too
johannes <johs@[EMAIL   2007-12-25 12:00:33 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
localhost-V2008-12-19 Wed Jan 7 11:47:00 PST 2009.