Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Electronic Equipment > PC Hardware Chips > Re: A case for ...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 23 of 24 Topic 2688 of 2798
Post > Topic >>

Re: A case for Dual System Cabinets

by chrisv <chrisv@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Dec 27, 2007 at 10:04 AM

Robert Redelmeier wrote:

>I used to be very concerned about integrated graphics spoiling
>desktop performance by stealing bandwidth.  Then I tested my
>new Xmas present:  2.44 GB/s increases to 2.50 with a separate
>vidcard.  Round-trip latency goes from 82 to 81ns.  I'm very
>underwhelmed and doubt I'll buy a vidcard for it.

Reminds of of when I was made fun of because I didn't really care that
the new motherboard that I was considering didn't have the new
Ethernet controller that didn't "steal bandwidth" from the PCI bus.  

I asked, "What is the PCI bus for?  To sit there looking pretty or to
provide bandwidth to devices that need it?" and "How much of my PCI
bandwidth is my Ethernet connection, usually limited by a ~1Mb/s
Internet connection, using-up anyway?"
 




 24 Posts in Topic:
Re: A case for Dual System Cabinets
"philo" <phi  2007-12-25 09:59:00 
Re: A case for Dual System Cabinets
a?n?g?e?l@[EMAIL PROTECTE  2007-12-25 04:42:40 
Re: A case for Dual System Cabinets
kony <spam@[EMAIL PROT  2007-12-26 03:58:28 
Re: A case for Dual System Cabinets
a?n?g?e?l@[EMAIL PROTECTE  2007-12-25 15:24:51 
Re: A case for Dual System Cabinets
Robert Redelmeier <red  2007-12-26 23:51:19 
Re: A case for Dual System Cabinets
kony <spam@[EMAIL PROT  2007-12-26 23:59:33 
Re: A case for Dual System Cabinets
Robert Redelmeier <red  2007-12-27 05:32:38 
Re: A case for Dual System Cabinets
kony <spam@[EMAIL PROT  2007-12-27 02:06:52 
Re: A case for Dual System Cabinets
kony <spam@[EMAIL PROT  2007-12-27 14:16:03 
Re: A case for Dual System Cabinets
a?n?g?e?l@[EMAIL PROTECTE  2007-12-27 03:51:41 
Re: A case for Dual System Cabinets
Sebastian Kaliszewski <  2007-12-28 12:56:58 
Re: A case for Dual System Cabinets
a?n?g?e?l@[EMAIL PROTECTE  2007-12-28 13:34:35 
Re: A case for Dual System Cabinets
Sebastian Kaliszewski <  2008-01-02 15:17:50 
Re: A case for Dual System Cabinets
a?n?g?e?l@[EMAIL PROTECTE  2008-01-03 18:22:27 
Re: A case for Dual System Cabinets
kony <spam@[EMAIL PROT  2008-01-03 17:25:33 
Re: A case for Dual System Cabinets
a?n?g?e?l@[EMAIL PROTECTE  2008-01-04 16:33:19 
Re: A case for Dual System Cabinets
Sebastian Kaliszewski <  2008-01-04 18:56:03 
Re: A case for Dual System Cabinets
Sebastian Kaliszewski <  2008-01-04 18:45:47 
Re: A case for Dual System Cabinets
Robert Redelmeier <red  2007-12-27 19:28:32 
Re: A case for Dual System Cabinets
kony <spam@[EMAIL PROT  2007-12-28 03:28:24 
Re: A case for Dual System Cabinets
Robert Redelmeier <red  2007-12-28 15:22:46 
Re: A case for Dual System Cabinets
kony <spam@[EMAIL PROT  2007-12-28 22:15:16 
Re: A case for Dual System Cabinets
chrisv <chrisv@[EMAIL   2007-12-27 10:04:09 
Re: A case for Dual System Cabinets
kony <spam@[EMAIL PROT  2007-12-27 14:23:32 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Sun Nov 23 12:38:35 CST 2008.