Talk About Network

Google





Electronic Equipment > PC Hardware Chips > Re: Multi-core ...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 16 of 25 Topic 2739 of 2812
Post > Topic >>

Re: Multi-core and memory

by "Chris Thomasson" <cristom@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Jun 6, 2008 at 04:26 PM

"Neal" <nealcrago@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message 
news:271037cf-11a1-488e-a572-d7f5b5255b0a@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On May 21, 11:23 pm, "Chris Thomasson" <cris...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>> "Rui Pedro Mendes Salgueiro" <r...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in 
>> messagenews:g0v24v$f8o$1@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>> > Hello
>>
>> > Would it make sense to have multiple memory interfaces in multi-core 
>> > CPUs
>> > ?
>> > Have Intel or AMD announced plans to have such a thing ?
>>
>> [...]
>>
>> I have always wondered why a multi-core CPU could not be
>> __directly_integrated__ into a memory card. IMHO, a 2GB mem-card should

>> be
>> able to physically integrate with one or two multi-core CPU's. The
memory
>> which resides on the same card as the CPU(s) could be accessed using a 
>> cache
>> coherent shared memory model. If one card needs to communicate with 
>> another,
>> then a message-passing interface would be utilized. Think of a single
>> desktop sized system that has 8 2GB cards with two 64-core CPU's 
>> per-card.
>> That's 16GB of total distributed memory running on 1024 cores...
>>
>> Does anybody know of any experimental projects that are trying to 
>> accomplish
>> something even vaguely similar?
>>
>> Of course, the chip vendor would need to be the memory vendor as
well...
>> Humm...
>>
>> IMVHO, drastically reducing the physical distance between the chip and 
>> its
>> local memory can be very im****tant factor wrt scalability concerns. It
>> should be ideal to merge the chip and a couple of GB of memory into a 
>> single
>> unit.
>>
>> Intra-CPU to local memory  communication would use shared memory, and
>> inter-CPU and remote memory communication would use message passing. It
>> seems the scheme could be made to work... What am I missing?
>>
>> With this type of setup, it seems like each card could be running a 
>> separate
>> operating system that is physically isolated from the other cards in
the
>> system. Their only communication medium would be message passing. OS(a)
>> running on Card(a) could communicate with OS(b) running on Card(b)
using
>> MPI. Card(a) intra-comm could use shared memory. This sure seems like
it
>> would scale. Adding extra cards would not seem to be a problem. They 
>> might
>> even be able to be hot-swappable. Humm...
>>
>> The programming model would be something like:
>>
>> http://groups.google.com/group/comp.arch/msg/18dbf634f491f46b
>>
>> http://groups.google.com/group/comp.arch/msg/2e5eeaecd0e69aed
>>
>> Basically, intra-node communication is analogous to inter-card comms,
and
>> inter-node comms would be similar to inter-card comm...
>>
>> Any thoughts?
>
> Are you talking about processor in memory (PIM) and intelligent RAM
> (IRAM)? There are many academic projects which have implemented/
> proposed what you are talking about.

I am talking about integrating a multi-core processor with a 2GB of DDR3 
memory in a single pluggable card. Think if one could cram a N-core 
processor directly into the following card:

http://www.corsair.com/products/dominator.aspx

I was just wondering of that could be possible, or if its a pipe-dream...

:^o
 




 25 Posts in Topic:
Multi-core and memory
Rui Pedro Mendes Salgueir  2008-05-20 19:35:27 
Re: Multi-core and memory
MitchAlsup <MitchAlsup  2008-05-20 15:15:32 
Re: Multi-core and memory
Rui Pedro Mendes Salgueir  2008-05-21 12:05:37 
Re: Multi-core and memory
archmage@[EMAIL PROTECTED  2008-05-21 13:41:58 
Re: Multi-core and memory
Evandro Menezes <evand  2008-05-21 09:08:43 
Re: Multi-core and memory
Evandro Menezes <evand  2008-05-21 09:12:49 
Re: Multi-core and memory
MitchAlsup <MitchAlsup  2008-05-21 09:26:56 
Re: Multi-core and memory
"Chris Thomasson&quo  2008-05-21 23:23:16 
Re: Multi-core and memory
MitchAlsup <MitchAlsup  2008-05-22 08:38:30 
Re: Multi-core and memory
"Chris Thomasson&quo  2008-05-28 13:20:29 
Re: Multi-core and memory
"Chris Thomasson&quo  2008-06-01 01:43:22 
Re: Multi-core and memory
"Del Cecchi" &l  2008-06-01 22:28:51 
Re: Multi-core and memory
owenclivet <owenclivet  2008-06-08 07:27:29 
Re: Multi-core and memory
earth <earth.294cba6@[  2008-06-10 20:00:48 
Re: Multi-core and memory
Neal <nealcrago@[EMAIL  2008-06-06 15:56:27 
Re: Multi-core and memory
"Chris Thomasson&quo  2008-06-06 16:26:00 
Re: Multi-core and memory
gavin@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-06-06 20:37:27 
Re: Multi-core and memory
"Chris Thomasson&quo  2008-06-10 23:17:39 
Re: Multi-core and memory
nmm1@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (  2008-06-11 08:40:25 
Re: Multi-core and memory
Neal <nealcrago@[EMAIL  2008-06-06 16:50:22 
Re: Multi-core and memory
Robert Myers <rbmyersu  2008-06-06 17:52:45 
Re: Multi-core and memory
"Chris Thomasson&quo  2008-06-06 22:07:26 
Re: Multi-core and memory
"Chris Thomasson&quo  2008-06-10 03:14:52 
Re: Multi-core and memory
"Del Cecchi" &l  2008-06-10 10:40:54 
Re: Multi-core and memory
nmm1@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (  2008-06-10 16:23:02 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
localhost-V2008-12-19 Wed Jan 7 17:10:23 PST 2009.