In article <7270e300-fc2d-4cbf-8127-0027932a2b0f@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>, rbmyersusa@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
says...
> On Sep 6, 10:32=A0pm, Robert Myers <rbmyers...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> > On Sep 6, 3:18=A0pm, Robert Redelmeier <red...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
wrote:>=
Robert Myers <rbmyers...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in part:
> >
> > > > We're done. =A0Go play.
> >
> > > Is that the Royal "We"? =A0Or are you presuming to speak for me?
> > > _You_ might well be done. =A0But I have given you cause to doubt
> > > that I would be.
> >
> > "We," Robert, means you and I. =A0Without a "me," there is no "we."
> > That's it. =A0Perseverate from now until kingdom come. =A0Whatever it
i=
s,
> > if it involves you, it won't involve me.
So you've been saying (but NOT doing). Bye now!
> One final thought: when I make little errors quoting poetry from
> memory, it sure does make it a ***** to find them with google, don't
> it?
Not as stupid as it is to copy incorrectly form Google in the first=20
place.
--=20
Keith
|
