In article <a2db0371-162d-4cd4-a31e-
6ab8057cba7b@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>, rbmyersusa@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On Sep 7, 7:53=A0pm, krw <k...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> > In article <7270e300-fc2d-4cbf-8127-0027932a2b0f@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > 8g2000hse.googlegroups.com>, rbmyers...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
says...
> >
> > > On Sep 6, 10:32=A0pm, Robert Myers <rbmyers...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> > > > On Sep 6, 3:18=A0pm, Robert Redelmeier <red...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
wro=
te:> Robert Myers <rbmyers...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in part:
> >
> > > > > > We're done. =A0Go play.
> >
> > > > > Is that the Royal "We"? =A0Or are you presuming to speak for me?
> > > > > _You_ might well be done. =A0But I have given you cause to doubt
> > > > > that I would be.
> >
> > > > "We," Robert, means you and I. =A0Without a "me," there is no
"we."
> > > > That's it. =A0Perseverate from now until kingdom come. =A0Whatever
=
it is,
> > > > if it involves you, it won't involve me.
> >
> > So you've been saying (but NOT doing). =A0Bye now!
> >
> The discussion *was* about why the group is dead. =20
It was really always about you, wasn't it? Come on, fess up.
> You've been
> trolling my posts for years. See that you keep *your* promise.
> There, now I *have* called you a troll. Have fun name-calling back.
Ah! You just said you never call people trolls. You, sir, are a=20
LAIR. ...not that I'm surprised, but you are now on record for=20
everyone here to see.
Don't let the doorknob hit you in the ass on the way out.
> > > One final thought: when I make little errors quoting poetry from
> > > memory, it sure does make it a ***** to find them with google, don't
> > > it?
> >
> > Not as stupid as it is to copy incorrectly form Google in the first
> > place.
> >
> Well, dimwit, the *French* quote wasn' t actually poetry. I'll let
> you and the other expert figure it out.
You darf all over a quotation, call others on it, and call *me* a=20
dimwit? You are one piece of work.
--=20
Keith
|
