On Sep 7, 8:41=A0pm, krw <k...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> In article <a2db0371-162d-4cd4-a31e-
> 6ab8057cb...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>, rbmyers...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> says...
>
>
>
> > On Sep 7, 7:53=A0pm, krw <k...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> > > In article <7270e300-fc2d-4cbf-8127-0027932a2b0f@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > 8g2000hse.googlegroups.com>, rbmyers...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
says...
>
> > > > On Sep 6, 10:32=A0pm, Robert Myers <rbmyers...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> > > > > On Sep 6, 3:18=A0pm, Robert Redelmeier <red...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
w=
rote:> Robert Myers <rbmyers...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in part:
>
> > > > > > > We're done. =A0Go play.
>
> > > > > > Is that the Royal "We"? =A0Or are you presuming to speak for
me=
?
> > > > > > _You_ might well be done. =A0But I have given you cause to
doub=
t
> > > > > > that I would be.
>
> > > > > "We," Robert, means you and I. =A0Without a "me," there is no
"we=
.."
> > > > > That's it. =A0Perseverate from now until kingdom come.
=A0Whateve=
r it is,
> > > > > if it involves you, it won't involve me.
>
> > > So you've been saying (but NOT doing). =A0Bye now!
>
> > The discussion *was* about why the group is dead. =A0
>
> It was really always about you, wasn't it? =A0Come on, fess up.
>
Yes, it was. That was my full intent. To show that this was a group
where no sane person would remain. For the most part, they haven't.
Now it's a circle jerk, and you're in.
> > You've been
> > trolling my posts for years. =A0See that you keep *your* promise.
> > There, now I *have* called you a troll. =A0Have fun name-calling back.
>
> Ah! =A0You just said you never call people trolls. =A0You, sir, are a
> LAIR. =A0...not that I'm surprised, but you are now on record for
> everyone here to see.
>
No, dear. I said I never *called* anyone a troll--past tense. Now I
have, and you most certainly are one.
> Don't let the doorknob hit you in the ass on the way out.
>
You're not likely to be seeing much of me.
> > > > One final thought: when I make little errors quoting poetry from
> > > > memory, it sure does make it a ***** to find them with google,
don'=
t
> > > > it?
>
> > > Not as stupid as it is to copy incorrectly form Google in the first
> > > place.
>
> > Well, dimwit, the *French* quote wasn' t actually poetry. =A0I'll let
> > you and the other expert figure it out.
>
> You darf all over a quotation, call others on it, and call *me* a
> dimwit? =A0You are one piece of work.
>
You once crowed over how a poster in another forum had given me all
kinds of ****. He's dead now. One of my many errors, was to misquote
the speed of light by a factor of three. I expended all my energy
making sure I got the exponent right, as I am forever confusing
centimeters and meters. I'm absent-minded, a common trait in certain
kinds of minds--not generally thought of as stupid.
Dimensional quantities don't come up much in the kind of work I do. I
do, however, know the speed of light, but, in the heat of posting, I
can say just about anything. What does that prove? As G C Rota said,
I'll give anyone a factor of 2 or pi. I wouldn't make a very good
proofreader, and one of the things I find attractive about computers
is that calculations can be automated.
A focus on details like that is not a sign of intelligence to me.
Your mileage obviously varies. I didn't think Dennis O'Connor was all
that bright, either.
Your constant attacks wore themselves out on me a long time ago. You
plainly do not think much of me, but I really don't care. Your
bottomless well of nastiness tells me that there's probably something
wrong in your *** life or that you should be seeing a therapist, or
both.
Robert.
|
