On Sep 26, 5:24=A0pm, chrisv <chr...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> Robert Myers wrote:
> >On Sep 26, 9:13=A0am, chrisv <chr...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
> >> >What that has to do with "two main architectures" and what those two
> >> >(apparently obvious) main architectures would be is a chasm that
your
> >> >mind apparently crosses with ease but mine doesn't. =A0I made a
broad
> >> >point about the term "free market" and you narrowed it to your
> >> >perennial obsessions. =A0You're so wrapped up in this silly game
that
> >> >you can't see it for what it is. =A0In any case, what you have to
say=
is
> >> >a non sequitur.
>
> >> What any of the above nonsense means, and how it relates to me or
what
> >> I've written, is a mystery.
>
> >Translation: I write above your reading level. =A0It is what it is.
>
> You write at the gibberish level.
You only make yourself look like a fool. If you don't understand
something, it doesn't mean that it doesn't make any sense. If you
don't believe me, I suggest that you drop in on, say, a lecture in
quantum field theory.
Robert.
|
