On Sep 27, 12:48=A0am, Robert Myers <rbmyers...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> On Sep 26, 5:24=A0pm, chrisv <chr...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > Robert Myers wrote:
> > >On Sep 26, 9:13=A0am, chrisv <chr...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
> > >> >What that has to do with "two main architectures" and what those
tw=
o
> > >> >(apparently obvious) main architectures would be is a chasm that
yo=
ur
> > >> >mind apparently crosses with ease but mine doesn't. =A0I made a
bro=
ad
> > >> >point about the term "free market" and you narrowed it to your
> > >> >perennial obsessions. =A0You're so wrapped up in this silly game
th=
at
> > >> >you can't see it for what it is. =A0In any case, what you have to
s=
ay is
> > >> >a non sequitur.
>
> > >> What any of the above nonsense means, and how it relates to me or
wh=
at
> > >> I've written, is a mystery.
>
> > >Translation: I write above your reading level. =A0It is what it is.
>
> > You write at the gibberish level.
>
> You only make yourself look like a fool. =A0If you don't understand
> something, it doesn't mean that it doesn't make any sense. =A0If you
> don't believe me, I suggest that you drop in on, say, a lecture in
> quantum field theory.
A real genious can make even idiot understand what he means; he
masters the concepts he is conveying so well that he is able to
express them with least amount of effort. Since we all are human
beings with, let's assume, without any major defects in our brain we
should be on a fairly level footing here. I doubt that you have IQ
double of christv's, that would be highly improbable. So the chasm in
communication that exist is your own creation. Fix it.
|
