On Sep 30, 10:08=A0am, chrisv <chr...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
That's unusually astute for you, although you haven't got it quite
right. I moved the discussion into areas where I have strong
credentials (fluid mechanics, writers of whom I have extensive
knowledge) to show that Robert would follow and claim superior
knowledge no matter where I want. He obliged.
=A0Notice how he's managed
> to change the discussion from his illogic and his ****lling for the
> Intel Corp, to who has the bigger vocabulary? =A0
>
> Unfortunately for him, this group is about chips.
As with so many groups, it has become about individuals, as in the
accusation that I "****ll" for Intel, a claim that I think is legally
actionable. This group claimed that John Corse "****lled" for Rambus.
I don't know about John Corse. ****lling is a very specific and in
some cases reprehensible and illegal act, so you are making a very
serious accusation.
My real concern is the capital to do "big" technology. Companies like
AMD siphon off capital without making a commensurate contribution.
I'd rather have the resources in the hands of a strong company like
Intel or IBM. That's not religion, and it is certainly not ****lling.
It is an opinion, to which I am absolutely entitled. You, on the
other hand, are not entitled to defamatory claims about me. With AMD,
as with so many weak companies, the money will eventually wind up in
the hands of financial engineers, instead of real engineers and
scientists. That's only an opinion, but it is my opinion.
Robert.
|
