Re: A.M.D. to Split Into Two Operations

On Oct 9, 9:47=A0am, chrisv <chr...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> Robert Myers wrote:
> >On Oct 8, 10:12=A0am, chrisv <chr...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
> >> Gosh, you are smart. =A0Only you (and the blogger) have figured-out
th=
at
> >> AMD decided to do this not because they thought it was in the best
> >> interest of the company and its stockholders, but because they have a
> >> benevolent streak toward bankers.
>
> >There are plenty of people who would agree that cor****ate management,
> >often acting on the advice of outside consultants, frequently do not
> >act in the best interests of shareholders.
>
> So? =A0The fact that things are "sometimes wrong" is evidence that
> something is "wrong" with this deal?
>
> Sorry, but it's not.

Now *you're* an expert?  I don't think you pay attention to what you
write.  You were sarcastic that I had the nerve to question AMD's all-
knowing management.  I pointed out that the kind of criticism that
both I and the blogger offered is fairly common.  Whether it's
accurate criticism of this deal or not is beside the point.  As usual,
everyone who doesn't agree with you and cheer for AMD is an idiot--at
least from your point of view.

If you already knew what the blogger said or if you had some
subatantive response, you didn't say so.  Instead, you did what you
usually do: ridicule and bluster.

Robert.