Talk About Network

Google





Electronic Equipment > PC Hardware Chips > Re: A.M.D. to S...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 48 of 58 Topic 2785 of 2812
Post > Topic >>

Re: A.M.D. to Split Into Two Operations

by Robert Myers <rbmyersusa@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Oct 14, 2008 at 05:46 PM

On Oct 14, 8:24=A0pm, Robert Redelmeier <red...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> Robert Myers <rbmyers...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in part:
>
> > On Oct 13, 8:37=A0pm, Robert Redelmeier <red...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
wrote:
> >> Robert Myers <rbmyers...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in part:
> >> > There is nothing free about your "free" markets. =A0
> >> > It's just another tyranny with a different name.
>
> >> Oh? =A0Who is the big overarching tyrant? =A0Even Ben Bernanke
> >> doesn't have that much power. =A0By observation, Markets are
> >> much closer to volume-weighted democracies.
>
> > The US has become a plutocracy. =A0Apparently, that suits you. =A0
>
> Non-sequitur. =A0How does the US becoming a plutocracy (nor not)
> have anything to do with markets being "another tyranny"?
> Let alone what my personal preferences might be?
>
> Is jumping to conclusions an aerobic exercise for you?
>
I'm very sorry, learned professor, but, as usual, I can't follow you.

The US is ruled by money.  That's not a unique cir***stance, as the US
has been ruled by money for most of its history.

What's changed is that the veneer of Jeffersonian democracy has been
completely effaced, and we are left with self-justifying greed as the
ruling principle of our nation.  Whoever gets the most by whatever
means must be the most deserving to decide how we shall all live.

That's what "free" markets and their exponents have brought us in this
country.  It is a tyranny that keeps a permanent underclass and allows
inherited wealth to take the place of inherited nobility.

As to your personal preferences, everything you say indicates that you
align with conservatives and the free-marketeers in these matters, so
the arrangement apparently suits you.  That is to say, not only are we
saddled with a tyranny masquerading as economic "science," but you
personally are a sup****ter of this ugly system.

I don't spend a lot of time thinking about things like this, but your
apparent self-satisfaction and your repeated expressions of contempt
are repulsive.  If I were in a bar, Prof. Redelmeier, I'd suggest we
take it outside.  Now leave me alone.

Robert.
 




 58 Posts in Topic:
A.M.D. to Split Into Two Operations
Jan Panteltje <pNaonSt  2008-10-07 09:28:19 
Re: A.M.D. to Split Into Two Operations
Robert Myers <rbmyersu  2008-10-07 17:13:28 
Re: A.M.D. to Split Into Two Operations
Jan Panteltje <pNaonSt  2008-10-08 10:53:07 
Re: A.M.D. to Split Into Two Operations
chrisv <chrisv@[EMAIL   2008-10-08 09:03:27 
Re: A.M.D. to Split Into Two Operations
chrisv <chrisv@[EMAIL   2008-10-08 09:12:22 
Re: A.M.D. to Split Into Two Operations
Robert Myers <rbmyersu  2008-10-13 09:41:30 
Re: A.M.D. to Split Into Two Operations
Del Cecchi <delcecchin  2008-10-13 12:02:38 
Re: A.M.D. to Split Into Two Operations
Robert Myers <rbmyersu  2008-10-17 09:43:51 
Re: A.M.D. to Split Into Two Operations
Robert Redelmeier <red  2008-10-18 14:50:00 
Re: A.M.D. to Split Into Two Operations
Robert Myers <rbmyersu  2008-10-08 07:34:25 
Re: A.M.D. to Split Into Two Operations
chrisv <chrisv@[EMAIL   2008-10-09 08:47:13 
Re: A.M.D. to Split Into Two Operations
Robert Myers <rbmyersu  2008-10-13 11:17:19 
Re: A.M.D. to Split Into Two Operations
Del Cecchi` <dcecchino  2008-10-13 19:05:33 
Re: A.M.D. to Split Into Two Operations
chrisv <chrisv@[EMAIL   2008-10-14 11:48:07 
Re: A.M.D. to Split Into Two Operations
krw <krw@[EMAIL PROTEC  2008-10-15 20:03:34 
Re: A.M.D. to Split Into Two Operations
Robert Redelmeier <red  2008-10-14 00:37:47 
Re: A.M.D. to Split Into Two Operations
chrisv <chrisv@[EMAIL   2008-10-14 11:38:44 
Re: A.M.D. to Split Into Two Operations
Robert Myers <rbmyersu  2008-10-13 07:52:57 
Re: A.M.D. to Split Into Two Operations
chrisv <chrisv@[EMAIL   2008-10-13 10:57:56 
Re: A.M.D. to Split Into Two Operations
Robert Myers <rbmyersu  2008-10-08 08:08:52 
Re: A.M.D. to Split Into Two Operations
Robert Myers <rbmyersu  2008-10-09 09:28:21 
Re: A.M.D. to Split Into Two Operations
chrisv <chrisv@[EMAIL   2008-10-10 10:25:58 
Re: A.M.D. to Split Into Two Operations
"Del Cecchi" &l  2008-10-10 23:44:29 
Re: A.M.D. to Split Into Two Operations
Robert Redelmeier <red  2008-10-11 13:14:19 
Re: A.M.D. to Split Into Two Operations
krw <krw@[EMAIL PROTEC  2008-10-11 10:51:51 
Re: A.M.D. to Split Into Two Operations
"Del Cecchi" &l  2008-10-11 19:10:06 
Re: A.M.D. to Split Into Two Operations
Robert Myers <rbmyersu  2008-10-13 18:13:40 
Re: A.M.D. to Split Into Two Operations
Del Cecchi <delcecchin  2008-10-13 21:39:50 
Re: A.M.D. to Split Into Two Operations
chrisv <chrisv@[EMAIL   2008-10-14 11:46:35 
Re: A.M.D. to Split Into Two Operations
Robert Myers <rbmyersu  2008-10-11 07:15:51 
Re: A.M.D. to Split Into Two Operations
krw <krw@[EMAIL PROTEC  2008-10-11 10:53:51 
Re: A.M.D. to Split Into Two Operations
Del Cecchi` <dcecchino  2008-10-11 19:46:08 
Re: A.M.D. to Split Into Two Operations
Robert Myers <rbmyersu  2008-10-13 20:01:01 
Re: A.M.D. to Split Into Two Operations
Robert Myers <rbmyersu  2008-10-11 10:03:02 
Re: A.M.D. to Split Into Two Operations
krw <krw@[EMAIL PROTEC  2008-10-11 14:49:52 
Re: A.M.D. to Split Into Two Operations
Robert Myers <rbmyersu  2008-10-11 20:49:45 
Re: A.M.D. to Split Into Two Operations
Del Cecchi <delcecchin  2008-10-12 14:00:59 
Re: A.M.D. to Split Into Two Operations
chrisv <chrisv@[EMAIL   2008-10-13 08:11:56 
Re: A.M.D. to Split Into Two Operations
chrisv <chrisv@[EMAIL   2008-10-13 08:15:23 
Re: A.M.D. to Split Into Two Operations
Robert Myers <rbmyersu  2008-10-12 15:02:40 
Re: A.M.D. to Split Into Two Operations
Del Cecchi` <dcecchino  2008-10-12 18:50:02 
Re: A.M.D. to Split Into Two Operations
krw <krw@[EMAIL PROTEC  2008-10-12 19:52:34 
Re: A.M.D. to Split Into Two Operations
Robert Myers <rbmyersu  2008-10-13 18:45:48 
Re: A.M.D. to Split Into Two Operations
chrisv <chrisv@[EMAIL   2008-10-14 11:37:18 
Re: A.M.D. to Split Into Two Operations
Robert Redelmeier <red  2008-10-15 00:24:19 
Re: A.M.D. to Split Into Two Operations
Robert Myers <rbmyersu  2008-10-12 19:39:17 
Re: A.M.D. to Split Into Two Operations
Del Cecchi <delcecchin  2008-10-12 22:31:25 
Re: A.M.D. to Split Into Two Operations
Robert Myers <rbmyersu  2008-10-14 17:46:08 
Re: A.M.D. to Split Into Two Operations
Robert Redelmeier <red  2008-10-16 12:10:58 
Re: A.M.D. to Split Into Two Operations
Robert Myers <rbmyersu  2008-10-14 10:20:22 
Re: A.M.D. to Split Into Two Operations
Robert Myers <rbmyersu  2008-10-15 20:33:59 
Re: A.M.D. to Split Into Two Operations
krw <krw@[EMAIL PROTEC  2008-10-15 23:05:20 
Re: A.M.D. to Split Into Two Operations
Robert Myers <rbmyersu  2008-10-15 23:15:42 
Re: A.M.D. to Split Into Two Operations
Robert Myers <rbmyersu  2008-10-13 08:22:11 
Re: A.M.D. to Split Into Two Operations
Del Cecchi <delcecchin  2008-10-13 11:13:05 
Re: A.M.D. to Split Into Two Operations
Robert Myers <rbmyersu  2008-10-16 08:41:02 
Re: A.M.D. to Split Into Two Operations
Robert Redelmeier <red  2008-10-17 14:46:06 
Re: A.M.D. to Split Into Two Operations
Ed <nospam@[EMAIL PROT  2008-10-11 19:49:56 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
localhost-V2008-12-19 Wed Jan 7 22:17:25 PST 2009.