Re: A.M.D. to Split Into Two Operations

Robert Myers <rbmyersusa@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in part:
> On Oct 17, 10:46am, Robert Redelmeier <red...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>> Robert Myers <rbmyers...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in part:
>> > and you have provoked me to great anger,
>>
>> I have stated that was not my intention. I do not believe
>> that anger is a emotion but rather a method of expressing
>> primary emotions like fear, loss, and maybe greed.
>>
>> You should examine and understand your anger. It hurts you far
>> more than any target. Yet your body puts you through it for some
>> reason to justify the high metabolic expense.  It must have some
>> value or would have been deselected many generations ago. But
>> try to resolve its message so you don't keep paying the cost.

> This is classic Robert Redelmeier.  You apparently assume
> that you understand what's going on with me better than I do.
> Keith has the same delusion.

I assume no such thing.  I do not have the data.  However, 
I _can_ offer generalities you might not have considered.

> As I have mentioned previously, I don't have to rely on
> random passers- by for the kind of advice you are offering.
> I'll just leave it at that.

I'll assume that means profession help.   Good.

> There are more things under the sun than you are even aware of.  

When have I ever claimed otherwise?

> You intrusive rudeness, well-meaning though it may be,
> is just intrusive rudeness.  Accept people as they come
> and stop trying to change them to suit your preconceptions
> (which were handed to you, anyway).


As I said before, I am not trying to change you.  I feel obliged
to reply because you complain I caused you "great anger".  I can
hardly intrude when you invite me in.


-- Robert R