Art Deco <erfc@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> writes:
> :nelohT, "tholen@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
" as posting
Still suffering from attribution and grammar problems, Deco?
>>> :nelohT, "tholen@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
" as posting
>>>>> :nelohT, "tholen@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
" as posting
>>>> Still suffering from attribution and grammar problems, Deco?
>>> Because you remove "tholen@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:" from the tops of your
>>> posts, I have to change them to something that causes you to whine
>>> about "attribution problems" so that other people can see to whom I'm
>>> replying, Tholen.
>>>
>>> But you do seem to enjoy typing "still suffering from attribution
>>> problems" a great deal, seeing that you've posted this particular
>>> phrase about a zillion times.
> Note: no response.
Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>>>>>>> :nelohT, "tholen@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
" as posting
>>>>>> Still suffering from attribution and grammar problems, Deco?
>>>>> Response.
>>>> I see that you didn't answer the question, Deco.
>>> I see that you didn't like my answer, Tholen.
>> Classic erroneous presupposition.
> So you did like my answer then.
Classic erroneous presupposition coupled with classic illogic on your
part, Deco.
|
