Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Electronic Equipment > Radio Scanner > Re: Radiorefere...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 1 of 42 Topic 5276 of 5382
Post > Topic >>

Re: Radioreference.com forums comments

by "john q" <johnq@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Apr 13, 2008 at 10:51 AM

"Ron Purdue" <ronpurdue@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
news:1206581213_32@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Any comments or complaints about their forums?
>
>  Posted Via Usenet.com Premium Usenet Newsgroup Services
> ----------------------------------------------------------
>     ** SPEED ** RETENTION ** COMPLETION ** ANONYMITY **
> ---------------------------------------------------------- 
>                 http://www.usenet.com


comments ? yeah, ranks as one of the largest
collection of assholes on the net.

(a). they have a 'shack' picture forum. evidently it's like AA.
     you can post a picture of a cardboard box with a tin can,
     and people will chime in and say 'yeah, great shack dude!'.
     (instead of being man about it and just telling the guy,
     his freakin "shack" is a **** hole ! and he needs to get
     his act together before showing it off for public view).

(b). all-cops-are-right attitude - some posters have posted
     story links to corrupt/crooked cops - so much so it became
     an epidemic. posters were flamed for being 'anti-cop' when
     in fact, all they did is point out new stories allready
     public knowledge in print or television.

(c). many (as others have pointed out), 'know-it-alls' who pretend
     to have knowledge they don't have, and will espouse all sorts
     of gibberish (and can't even use correct grammar or spelling).
     a favorite topic appears to be "digital" systems. many "experts"
     chiming in with their dubious opinions.

(d). many 20 something "whackers" - ie. volley fire & rescue guys
     who get off on having emergency lights/radios in their personal
     vehicles.


you may want to check out the "ham***y forums" - now those guys
are freakin hilarious ! the outlaw/wildwest amateur radio/redlight
district if you will.
 




 42 Posts in Topic:
Re: Radioreference.com forums comments
"john q" <jo  2008-04-13 10:51:26 
Re: Radioreference.com forums comments
JB Junior <none@[EMAIL  2008-04-13 17:43:17 
Re: Radioreference.com forums comments
ronpurdue@[EMAIL PROTECTE  2008-04-24 20:38:33 
Re: Radioreference.com forums comments
nova1010 <nova1010.26c  2008-05-11 07:00:29 
Re: Radioreference.com forums comments
RadioJay <RadioJay.26f  2008-05-13 14:36:15 
Re: Radioreference.com forums comments
Janitor Boy Jr <nosp@[  2008-05-13 18:58:50 
Re: Radioreference.com forums comments
 Bluto < @[EMAIL PROTE  2008-05-15 17:52:33 
Re: Radioreference.com forums comments
nova1010 <nova1010.274  2008-05-17 18:45:12 
Re: Radioreference.com forums comments
Janitor Boy Jr <nosp@[  2008-05-18 03:05:27 
Re: Radioreference.com forums comments
 Bluto < @[EMAIL PROTE  2008-05-18 06:49:00 
Re: Radioreference.com forums comments
 Bluto < @[EMAIL PROTE  2008-05-18 06:50:09 
Re: Radioreference.com forums comments
Mats Peterson <matsp55  2008-05-18 10:58:13 
Re: Radioreference.com forums comments
RadioJay <RadioJay.276  2008-05-18 15:31:13 
Re: Radioreference.com forums comments
Sarah Czepiel <ninety7  2008-05-18 17:00:47 
Re: Radioreference.com forums comments
nova1010 <nova1010.276  2008-05-19 05:51:25 
Re: Radioreference.com forums comments
 Bluto < @[EMAIL PROTE  2008-05-18 06:46:57 
Re: Radioreference.com forums comments
Sarah Czepiel <ninety7  2008-05-18 14:02:36 
Re: Radioreference.com forums comments
Mats Peterson <matsp55  2008-05-18 20:51:03 
Re: Radioreference.com forums comments
MegaForce <MegaForce.2  2008-05-19 02:45:15 
Re: Radioreference.com forums comments
Sarah Czepiel <ninety7  2008-05-18 23:46:16 
Re: Radioreference.com forums comments
Mats Peterson <matsp55  2008-05-19 05:23:00 
Re: Radioreference.com forums comments
nova1010 <nova1010.277  2008-05-19 15:32:23 
Re: Radioreference.com forums comments
Sarah Czepiel <ninety7  2008-05-20 13:39:40 
Re: Radioreference.com forums comments
 Bluto < @[EMAIL PROTE  2008-05-20 13:48:58 
Re: Radioreference.com forums comments
Sarah Czepiel <ninety7  2008-05-20 19:21:30 
Re: Radioreference.com forums comments
 Bluto < @[EMAIL PROTE  2008-05-21 08:13:44 
Re: Radioreference.com forums comments
Mats Peterson <matsp55  2008-05-20 18:03:47 
Re: Radioreference.com forums comments
Sarah Czepiel <ninety7  2008-05-20 19:24:27 
Re: Radioreference.com forums comments
RadioJay <RadioJay.277  2008-05-19 21:05:04 
Re: Radioreference.com forums comments
Mats Peterson <matsp55  2008-05-20 07:45:27 
Re: Radioreference.com forums comments
Mats Peterson <matsp55  2008-05-20 07:48:33 
Re: Radioreference.com forums comments
Sarah Czepiel <ninety7  2008-05-20 19:23:54 
Re: Radioreference.com forums comments
"RSweeney1" <  2008-05-19 13:32:32 
Re: Radioreference.com forums comments
 Bluto < @[EMAIL PROTE  2008-05-20 09:12:53 
Re: Radioreference.com forums comments
Mats Peterson <matsp55  2008-05-20 13:46:06 
Re: Radioreference.com forums comments
"RSweeney" <  2008-05-20 22:08:25 
Re: Radioreference.com forums comments
Mats Peterson <matsp55  2008-05-14 04:53:29 
Re: Radioreference.com forums comments
MegaForce <MegaForce.2  2008-05-15 21:41:37 
Re: Radioreference.com forums comments
Sarah Czepiel <ninety7  2008-05-16 15:20:53 
Re: Radioreference.com forums comments
Mats Peterson <matsp55  2008-05-17 15:03:09 
Re: Radioreference.com forums comments
Sarah Czepiel <ninety7  2008-05-18 13:17:30 
Re: Radioreference.com forums comments
Mats Peterson <matsp55  2008-05-18 20:56:29 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Thu Aug 28 22:25:12 CDT 2008.