Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Electronic Equipment > Radio Scanner > Re: Radiorefere...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 7 of 42 Topic 5276 of 5423
Post > Topic >>

Re: Radioreference.com forums comments

by  Bluto < @[EMAIL PROTECTED] > May 15, 2008 at 05:52 PM

On Sun, 11 May 2008 07:00:29 +0100, nova1010
<nova1010.26c5df3@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:

>
>ronpurdue@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Wrote: 
>> They are a whole bunch of communists and surpresses freedom of speech!
>> They
>> want encryption on the scanner, even one guy says encryption is an
>> excellant
>> tool! LOL
>
>I don't know where you get your information but you sure do have a good
>imagination.You should write for the Enquirer.

Or write for radioreference.com

>To call everyone on there communists is a crappy thing to say.

How many aren't?

>Name one scanner listener on there that wants encryption(you can't)

Check their members list.

>In my opinion RadioReference is one of the best sites out there.

Opinions are like assholes, everyone has one

>Tons of information

And more tons of misinformation

>Alot of good people on there willing to help anyone(except you maybe
>thats why your ticked off)

All fighting to see who thinks they know the most.

>How many sites out there that you can program your scanner via the
>website? answer is one (radioreference)

But you have to pay if you use programming software.  Freqs are all
over the internet.  If you can't enter your own freqs into your
scanner than you NEED radioreference.

>I can go on and on but I don't need much to prove you wrong.

The only thing you proved is to enforce the prior opinions of rr.com

>Anyone listening to this fool need their head examined.

Go back to rr.  You're one of their know-it-alls WHO needs rr.com
to program their scanner for them! hahahohohoohhehehe
 




 42 Posts in Topic:
Re: Radioreference.com forums comments
"john q" <jo  2008-04-13 10:51:26 
Re: Radioreference.com forums comments
JB Junior <none@[EMAIL  2008-04-13 17:43:17 
Re: Radioreference.com forums comments
ronpurdue@[EMAIL PROTECTE  2008-04-24 20:38:33 
Re: Radioreference.com forums comments
nova1010 <nova1010.26c  2008-05-11 07:00:29 
Re: Radioreference.com forums comments
RadioJay <RadioJay.26f  2008-05-13 14:36:15 
Re: Radioreference.com forums comments
Janitor Boy Jr <nosp@[  2008-05-13 18:58:50 
Re: Radioreference.com forums comments
 Bluto < @[EMAIL PROTE  2008-05-15 17:52:33 
Re: Radioreference.com forums comments
nova1010 <nova1010.274  2008-05-17 18:45:12 
Re: Radioreference.com forums comments
Janitor Boy Jr <nosp@[  2008-05-18 03:05:27 
Re: Radioreference.com forums comments
 Bluto < @[EMAIL PROTE  2008-05-18 06:49:00 
Re: Radioreference.com forums comments
 Bluto < @[EMAIL PROTE  2008-05-18 06:50:09 
Re: Radioreference.com forums comments
Mats Peterson <matsp55  2008-05-18 10:58:13 
Re: Radioreference.com forums comments
RadioJay <RadioJay.276  2008-05-18 15:31:13 
Re: Radioreference.com forums comments
Sarah Czepiel <ninety7  2008-05-18 17:00:47 
Re: Radioreference.com forums comments
nova1010 <nova1010.276  2008-05-19 05:51:25 
Re: Radioreference.com forums comments
 Bluto < @[EMAIL PROTE  2008-05-18 06:46:57 
Re: Radioreference.com forums comments
Sarah Czepiel <ninety7  2008-05-18 14:02:36 
Re: Radioreference.com forums comments
Mats Peterson <matsp55  2008-05-18 20:51:03 
Re: Radioreference.com forums comments
MegaForce <MegaForce.2  2008-05-19 02:45:15 
Re: Radioreference.com forums comments
Sarah Czepiel <ninety7  2008-05-18 23:46:16 
Re: Radioreference.com forums comments
Mats Peterson <matsp55  2008-05-19 05:23:00 
Re: Radioreference.com forums comments
nova1010 <nova1010.277  2008-05-19 15:32:23 
Re: Radioreference.com forums comments
Sarah Czepiel <ninety7  2008-05-20 13:39:40 
Re: Radioreference.com forums comments
 Bluto < @[EMAIL PROTE  2008-05-20 13:48:58 
Re: Radioreference.com forums comments
Sarah Czepiel <ninety7  2008-05-20 19:21:30 
Re: Radioreference.com forums comments
 Bluto < @[EMAIL PROTE  2008-05-21 08:13:44 
Re: Radioreference.com forums comments
Mats Peterson <matsp55  2008-05-20 18:03:47 
Re: Radioreference.com forums comments
Sarah Czepiel <ninety7  2008-05-20 19:24:27 
Re: Radioreference.com forums comments
RadioJay <RadioJay.277  2008-05-19 21:05:04 
Re: Radioreference.com forums comments
Mats Peterson <matsp55  2008-05-20 07:45:27 
Re: Radioreference.com forums comments
Mats Peterson <matsp55  2008-05-20 07:48:33 
Re: Radioreference.com forums comments
Sarah Czepiel <ninety7  2008-05-20 19:23:54 
Re: Radioreference.com forums comments
"RSweeney1" <  2008-05-19 13:32:32 
Re: Radioreference.com forums comments
 Bluto < @[EMAIL PROTE  2008-05-20 09:12:53 
Re: Radioreference.com forums comments
Mats Peterson <matsp55  2008-05-20 13:46:06 
Re: Radioreference.com forums comments
"RSweeney" <  2008-05-20 22:08:25 
Re: Radioreference.com forums comments
Mats Peterson <matsp55  2008-05-14 04:53:29 
Re: Radioreference.com forums comments
MegaForce <MegaForce.2  2008-05-15 21:41:37 
Re: Radioreference.com forums comments
Sarah Czepiel <ninety7  2008-05-16 15:20:53 
Re: Radioreference.com forums comments
Mats Peterson <matsp55  2008-05-17 15:03:09 
Re: Radioreference.com forums comments
Sarah Czepiel <ninety7  2008-05-18 13:17:30 
Re: Radioreference.com forums comments
Mats Peterson <matsp55  2008-05-18 20:56:29 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Sat Nov 22 6:22:10 CST 2008.