Sarah Czepiel <ninety7gt@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> On Thu, 15 May 2008 21:41:37 +0100, MegaForce
> <MegaForce.272a109@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
> :>I agree - they both have a "cops are always right" attitude, AND
certain
> :>"good old boys" can do no wrong, even when starting crap with people
> :>who's only crime is asking a question.
> :>
> :>As an example, I give you the following:
> :>
> :>Scanners & CB radios
> :>
> :>MegaForce Wrote:
> :>> Been having a hell of a time with this. Me & my friends are gonna be
> :>> using some handheld CBs this summer, and I can't find
> :>> a scanner that covers the frequencies.
> :>> If anyone can help out, i'd be much abliged.
> :>Hoser147 Wrote:
> :>> RS pro 96 and 95
> :>snikliw87 Wrote:
> :>> Bct15
> :>Pain Wrote:
> :>> Uniden BC72XLT would work
> :>InDICa Wrote:
> :>> Icom-R10,Icom-R20,AR-8200,Alinco DJ-X10,DJ-X2000 all work great on
that
> :>> band!
> :>
> :>Pretty good so far - getting some decenet info to really help me out.
>
> Ok so far.
>
> :>BUT, then along comes THIS bozo...
> :>
> :>loumaag Wrote:
> :>> Two thoughts come to mind when I read this thread.
> :>> 1. If you are using CB radios, why do you need scanners to listen to
> :>> them?
> :>> 2. I think the list of scanners that don't cover the CB band is
> :>> considerably shorter than the one that does.
> :>
> :>And of course, another quickly jumps on the bandwagon...
> :>andy404ns Wrote:
> :>> lou you read my mind
>
> The first is a completely legitimate question. Frankly it crossed my
mind
> as well when I was reading your example/explanation.
>
> The second comment answered *your* question.
>
> :>Now, the REASON I was asking was because This summer a group of us
plan
> :>to use CB radios during variopus events - we'll be using at least 2
> :>channels, and I wanted to set up a scanner with both channels back at
> :>my house to monitor & record all that goes on (As invariably things
can
> :>happen - like the drunk who attacked one of our volunteers at the
> :>haunted house last october).
>
> Perhaps you could have given more details in your original question.
Or
> explained it further after their response. You, as we see, chose to
take
> the low road, the path I suspect most well worn in your travels.
>
> :>Instead of posting more information, Loudick and his butt buddy start
> :>suggesting that what I'm doing is somehow criminal in nature!
>
> What? Criminal? Did you read and understand the answer?
>
> " I think the list of scanners that don't cover the CB band is
considerably
> shorter than the one that does. "
>
> He is telling you that almost all scanners include/carry the CB bands.
>
> Humor me: Please point out where you think either respondent was
> suggesting you were doing something illegal.
>
>
> :>Before responding, I checked their post list.... and found that they
> :>LOVE doing this kind of crap - and the admins ignore it while leaning
> :>on the person they've pulled it on! SO, I dropped the axe.
>
> You dropped the axe, your way of saying you were going to act like an
> ignorant boor, because you couldn't understand the answers you were
given.
>
> :>MegaForce Wrote:
> :>> So THAT'S how it is here - guy asks a question, and f**kheads start
> :>> making it into a mountain.
> :>> Had someone asked without turning it into something it's not,
would've
> :>> told you. GOOD GOING LOUIE, you ****ed me off. If
> :>> this is the kind of crap that's allowed here, then whoever runs this
> :>> place can kiss my a**!
> :>(NOTE: certain words censored before posting it here - was not
censored
> :>when I posted it at RR)
>
> You'll write the words in a moderated forum but censor yourself in an
> rec.* hierarchy newsgroup?
>
> :>I've also noticed car2back, Rolncode3, and a couple others ALSO do the
> :>same garbage. Just like certain people in the RW, the admins there
> :>practice "SELECTIVE ENFORCEMENT"!
> :>
> :>And for you RR dicks trolling this forum - F.O.A.D. !
> :>
> :>As I said in my last post there, they can kiss my ***
>
> If your immaturity wasn't enough, your grammar and spelling are both
> atrocious. I suspect after reading this little exchange that you've
been
> banned from the rr.com forums. Kudos' to the admins..
>
> And my answer is a big "No Thanks" to your arse-kissing invitation,
since
> I suspect your nether regions are probably as unwashed as the rest of
you.
>
> Cheers,
> Sarah Czepiel
:-)
--
Mats Peterson
http://www.geocities.com/matsp888/
|
