Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Electronic Equipment > Radio Scanner > Re: Radiorefere...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 42 of 42 Topic 5276 of 5423
Post > Topic >>

Re: Radioreference.com forums comments

by Mats Peterson <matsp555@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > May 18, 2008 at 08:56 PM

Sarah Czepiel <ninety7gt@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> On Sat, 17 May 2008 15:03:09 GMT, Mats Peterson <matsp555@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
wrote:
>
> :>Sarah Czepiel <ninety7gt@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> :>> On Thu, 15 May 2008 21:41:37 +0100, MegaForce
> :>> <MegaForce.272a109@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> :>>
> :>> :>I agree - they both have a "cops are always right" attitude, AND
certain
> :>> :>"good old boys" can do no wrong, even when starting crap with
people
> :>> :>who's only crime is asking a question.
> :>> :>
> :>> :>As an example, I give you the following:
> :>> :>
> :>> :>Scanners & CB radios
> :>> :>
> :>> :>MegaForce Wrote: 
> :>> :>> Been having a hell of a time with this. Me & my friends are
gonna be
> :>> :>> using some handheld CBs this summer, and I can't find
> :>> :>> a scanner that covers the frequencies.
> :>> :>> If anyone can help out, i'd be much abliged. 
> :>> :>Hoser147 Wrote: 
> :>> :>> RS pro 96 and 95 
> :>> :>snikliw87 Wrote: 
> :>> :>> Bct15 
> :>> :>Pain Wrote: 
> :>> :>> Uniden BC72XLT would work 
> :>> :>InDICa Wrote: 
> :>> :>> Icom-R10,Icom-R20,AR-8200,Alinco DJ-X10,DJ-X2000 all work great
on that
> :>> :>> band! 
> :>> :>
> :>> :>Pretty good so far - getting some decenet info to really help me
out.
> :>>
> :>> Ok so far.  
> :>>
> :>> :>BUT, then along comes THIS bozo...
> :>> :>
> :>> :>loumaag Wrote: 
> :>> :>> Two thoughts come to mind when I read this thread.
> :>> :>> 1. If you are using CB radios, why do you need scanners to
listen to
> :>> :>> them?
> :>> :>> 2. I think the list of scanners that don't cover the CB band is
> :>> :>> considerably shorter than the one that does. 
> :>> :>
> :>> :>And of course, another quickly jumps on the bandwagon...
> :>> :>andy404ns Wrote: 
> :>> :>> lou you read my mind 
> :>>
> :>> The first is a completely legitimate question.   Frankly it crossed
my mind
> :>> as well when I was reading your example/explanation.   
> :>>
> :>> The second comment answered *your* question.  
> :>>
> :>> :>Now, the REASON I was asking was because This summer a group of us
plan
> :>> :>to use CB radios during variopus events - we'll be using at least
2
> :>> :>channels, and I wanted to set up a scanner with both channels back
at
> :>> :>my house to monitor & record all that goes on (As invariably
things can
> :>> :>happen - like the drunk who attacked one of our volunteers at the
> :>> :>haunted house last october).
> :>>
> :>> Perhaps you could have given more details in your original question.
  Or
> :>> explained it further after their response.   You, as we see, chose
to take
> :>> the low road, the path I suspect most well worn in your travels.  
> :>>
> :>> :>Instead of posting more information, Loudick and his butt buddy
start
> :>> :>suggesting that what I'm doing is somehow criminal in nature! 
> :>>
> :>> What?   Criminal?   Did you read and understand the answer?    
> :>>
> :>> " I think the list of scanners that don't cover the CB band is
considerably
> :>> shorter than the one that does. "  
> :>>
> :>> He is telling you that almost all scanners include/carry the CB
bands.   
> :>>
> :>> Humor me:   Please point out where you think either respondent was
> :>> suggesting you were doing something illegal.  
> :>>
> :>>
> :>> :>Before responding, I checked their post list.... and found that
they
> :>> :>LOVE doing this kind of crap - and the admins ignore it while
leaning
> :>> :>on the person they've pulled it on! SO, I dropped the axe. 
> :>>
> :>> You dropped the axe, your way of saying you were going to act like
an
> :>> ignorant boor,  because you couldn't understand the answers you were
given.
> :>>
> :>> :>MegaForce Wrote: 
> :>> :>> So THAT'S how it is here - guy asks a question, and f**kheads
start
> :>> :>> making it into a mountain.
> :>> :>> Had someone asked without turning it into something it's not,
would've
> :>> :>> told you. GOOD GOING LOUIE, you ****ed me off. If
> :>> :>> this is the kind of crap that's allowed here, then whoever runs
this
> :>> :>> place can kiss my a**! 
> :>> :>(NOTE: certain words censored before posting it here - was not
censored
> :>> :>when I posted it at RR)
> :>>
> :>> You'll write the words  in a moderated forum but censor yourself in
an
> :>> rec.* hierarchy newsgroup?    
> :>>
> :>> :>I've also noticed car2back, Rolncode3, and a couple others ALSO do
the
> :>> :>same garbage. Just like certain people in the RW, the admins there
> :>> :>practice "SELECTIVE ENFORCEMENT"!
> :>> :>
> :>> :>And for you RR dicks trolling this forum - F.O.A.D. !
> :>> :>
> :>> :>As I said in my last post there, they can kiss my ***
> :>>
> :>> If your immaturity wasn't enough, your grammar and spelling are both
> :>> atrocious.   I suspect after reading this little exchange that
you've been
> :>> banned from the rr.com forums.    Kudos' to the admins..
> :>>
> :>> And my answer is a big "No Thanks"  to your arse-kissing invitation,
since
> :>> I suspect your nether regions are probably as unwashed as the rest
of you.
> :>>
> :>> Cheers,
> :>>           Sarah Czepiel
> :>
> :>:-)
>
>   < waves at Mats >     :)   

Waves back :)

-- 
Mats Peterson
http://www.geocities.com/matsp888/
 




 42 Posts in Topic:
Re: Radioreference.com forums comments
"john q" <jo  2008-04-13 10:51:26 
Re: Radioreference.com forums comments
JB Junior <none@[EMAIL  2008-04-13 17:43:17 
Re: Radioreference.com forums comments
ronpurdue@[EMAIL PROTECTE  2008-04-24 20:38:33 
Re: Radioreference.com forums comments
nova1010 <nova1010.26c  2008-05-11 07:00:29 
Re: Radioreference.com forums comments
RadioJay <RadioJay.26f  2008-05-13 14:36:15 
Re: Radioreference.com forums comments
Janitor Boy Jr <nosp@[  2008-05-13 18:58:50 
Re: Radioreference.com forums comments
 Bluto < @[EMAIL PROTE  2008-05-15 17:52:33 
Re: Radioreference.com forums comments
nova1010 <nova1010.274  2008-05-17 18:45:12 
Re: Radioreference.com forums comments
Janitor Boy Jr <nosp@[  2008-05-18 03:05:27 
Re: Radioreference.com forums comments
 Bluto < @[EMAIL PROTE  2008-05-18 06:49:00 
Re: Radioreference.com forums comments
 Bluto < @[EMAIL PROTE  2008-05-18 06:50:09 
Re: Radioreference.com forums comments
Mats Peterson <matsp55  2008-05-18 10:58:13 
Re: Radioreference.com forums comments
RadioJay <RadioJay.276  2008-05-18 15:31:13 
Re: Radioreference.com forums comments
Sarah Czepiel <ninety7  2008-05-18 17:00:47 
Re: Radioreference.com forums comments
nova1010 <nova1010.276  2008-05-19 05:51:25 
Re: Radioreference.com forums comments
 Bluto < @[EMAIL PROTE  2008-05-18 06:46:57 
Re: Radioreference.com forums comments
Sarah Czepiel <ninety7  2008-05-18 14:02:36 
Re: Radioreference.com forums comments
Mats Peterson <matsp55  2008-05-18 20:51:03 
Re: Radioreference.com forums comments
MegaForce <MegaForce.2  2008-05-19 02:45:15 
Re: Radioreference.com forums comments
Sarah Czepiel <ninety7  2008-05-18 23:46:16 
Re: Radioreference.com forums comments
Mats Peterson <matsp55  2008-05-19 05:23:00 
Re: Radioreference.com forums comments
nova1010 <nova1010.277  2008-05-19 15:32:23 
Re: Radioreference.com forums comments
Sarah Czepiel <ninety7  2008-05-20 13:39:40 
Re: Radioreference.com forums comments
 Bluto < @[EMAIL PROTE  2008-05-20 13:48:58 
Re: Radioreference.com forums comments
Sarah Czepiel <ninety7  2008-05-20 19:21:30 
Re: Radioreference.com forums comments
 Bluto < @[EMAIL PROTE  2008-05-21 08:13:44 
Re: Radioreference.com forums comments
Mats Peterson <matsp55  2008-05-20 18:03:47 
Re: Radioreference.com forums comments
Sarah Czepiel <ninety7  2008-05-20 19:24:27 
Re: Radioreference.com forums comments
RadioJay <RadioJay.277  2008-05-19 21:05:04 
Re: Radioreference.com forums comments
Mats Peterson <matsp55  2008-05-20 07:45:27 
Re: Radioreference.com forums comments
Mats Peterson <matsp55  2008-05-20 07:48:33 
Re: Radioreference.com forums comments
Sarah Czepiel <ninety7  2008-05-20 19:23:54 
Re: Radioreference.com forums comments
"RSweeney1" <  2008-05-19 13:32:32 
Re: Radioreference.com forums comments
 Bluto < @[EMAIL PROTE  2008-05-20 09:12:53 
Re: Radioreference.com forums comments
Mats Peterson <matsp55  2008-05-20 13:46:06 
Re: Radioreference.com forums comments
"RSweeney" <  2008-05-20 22:08:25 
Re: Radioreference.com forums comments
Mats Peterson <matsp55  2008-05-14 04:53:29 
Re: Radioreference.com forums comments
MegaForce <MegaForce.2  2008-05-15 21:41:37 
Re: Radioreference.com forums comments
Sarah Czepiel <ninety7  2008-05-16 15:20:53 
Re: Radioreference.com forums comments
Mats Peterson <matsp55  2008-05-17 15:03:09 
Re: Radioreference.com forums comments
Sarah Czepiel <ninety7  2008-05-18 13:17:30 
Re: Radioreference.com forums comments
Mats Peterson <matsp55  2008-05-18 20:56:29 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Sat Nov 22 6:33:39 CST 2008.