Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Electronic Equipment > Radio Scanner > Re: Radiorefere...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 14 of 42 Topic 5276 of 5423
Post > Topic >>

Re: Radioreference.com forums comments

by Sarah Czepiel <ninety7gt@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > May 18, 2008 at 05:00 PM

On Sun, 18 May 2008 15:31:13 +0100, RadioJay
<RadioJay.2764131@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:

:>
:>Nova1010 you are a perfect example of some of the ingratiating fools on
:>RR who can't just enjoy it for what it is without immersing yourself up
:>to the neck in forum drama and politics. Do you really think Lindsay
:>needs your "sup****t" - particularly the kind you are offering here
:>which basically amounts to childish taunts and flame bait? Then you run
:>back to RR jumping up and down excitedly pointing to the activity in
:>this thread. For crying out loud.... stop, count to ten, take a deep
:>breath.
:>
:>This isn't the skins vs the bloods, Nova1010. RR is a great forum and
:>the DB combined with Butel software is extremely convenient, but if you
:>can't acknowledge RR has problems too and the fact that some (not all)
:>of the grievances pointed out have some validity, then you're just
:>seeing one side of the story. The shame in all this is that free and
:>open discussion is discouraged with the RR good old boys club rallying
:>together to ridicule and ostracize each newcomer that "steps out of
:>line".  Some speak out while others like you try desperately to be part
:>of the club by doing what you are doing right now and ply for acceptance
:>among the forum bullies. But it's insincere and doesn't accomplish jack
:>in the end.  Think about it.

Sounds like Nova1010 is happy with the status quo.  You OTOH are making
baseless accusations about supposed activities while imploring him to
agree
with your POV.   Why are the opinions of those on rr.com so im****tant to
you?
 




 42 Posts in Topic:
Re: Radioreference.com forums comments
"john q" <jo  2008-04-13 10:51:26 
Re: Radioreference.com forums comments
JB Junior <none@[EMAIL  2008-04-13 17:43:17 
Re: Radioreference.com forums comments
ronpurdue@[EMAIL PROTECTE  2008-04-24 20:38:33 
Re: Radioreference.com forums comments
nova1010 <nova1010.26c  2008-05-11 07:00:29 
Re: Radioreference.com forums comments
RadioJay <RadioJay.26f  2008-05-13 14:36:15 
Re: Radioreference.com forums comments
Janitor Boy Jr <nosp@[  2008-05-13 18:58:50 
Re: Radioreference.com forums comments
 Bluto < @[EMAIL PROTE  2008-05-15 17:52:33 
Re: Radioreference.com forums comments
nova1010 <nova1010.274  2008-05-17 18:45:12 
Re: Radioreference.com forums comments
Janitor Boy Jr <nosp@[  2008-05-18 03:05:27 
Re: Radioreference.com forums comments
 Bluto < @[EMAIL PROTE  2008-05-18 06:49:00 
Re: Radioreference.com forums comments
 Bluto < @[EMAIL PROTE  2008-05-18 06:50:09 
Re: Radioreference.com forums comments
Mats Peterson <matsp55  2008-05-18 10:58:13 
Re: Radioreference.com forums comments
RadioJay <RadioJay.276  2008-05-18 15:31:13 
Re: Radioreference.com forums comments
Sarah Czepiel <ninety7  2008-05-18 17:00:47 
Re: Radioreference.com forums comments
nova1010 <nova1010.276  2008-05-19 05:51:25 
Re: Radioreference.com forums comments
 Bluto < @[EMAIL PROTE  2008-05-18 06:46:57 
Re: Radioreference.com forums comments
Sarah Czepiel <ninety7  2008-05-18 14:02:36 
Re: Radioreference.com forums comments
Mats Peterson <matsp55  2008-05-18 20:51:03 
Re: Radioreference.com forums comments
MegaForce <MegaForce.2  2008-05-19 02:45:15 
Re: Radioreference.com forums comments
Sarah Czepiel <ninety7  2008-05-18 23:46:16 
Re: Radioreference.com forums comments
Mats Peterson <matsp55  2008-05-19 05:23:00 
Re: Radioreference.com forums comments
nova1010 <nova1010.277  2008-05-19 15:32:23 
Re: Radioreference.com forums comments
Sarah Czepiel <ninety7  2008-05-20 13:39:40 
Re: Radioreference.com forums comments
 Bluto < @[EMAIL PROTE  2008-05-20 13:48:58 
Re: Radioreference.com forums comments
Sarah Czepiel <ninety7  2008-05-20 19:21:30 
Re: Radioreference.com forums comments
 Bluto < @[EMAIL PROTE  2008-05-21 08:13:44 
Re: Radioreference.com forums comments
Mats Peterson <matsp55  2008-05-20 18:03:47 
Re: Radioreference.com forums comments
Sarah Czepiel <ninety7  2008-05-20 19:24:27 
Re: Radioreference.com forums comments
RadioJay <RadioJay.277  2008-05-19 21:05:04 
Re: Radioreference.com forums comments
Mats Peterson <matsp55  2008-05-20 07:45:27 
Re: Radioreference.com forums comments
Mats Peterson <matsp55  2008-05-20 07:48:33 
Re: Radioreference.com forums comments
Sarah Czepiel <ninety7  2008-05-20 19:23:54 
Re: Radioreference.com forums comments
"RSweeney1" <  2008-05-19 13:32:32 
Re: Radioreference.com forums comments
 Bluto < @[EMAIL PROTE  2008-05-20 09:12:53 
Re: Radioreference.com forums comments
Mats Peterson <matsp55  2008-05-20 13:46:06 
Re: Radioreference.com forums comments
"RSweeney" <  2008-05-20 22:08:25 
Re: Radioreference.com forums comments
Mats Peterson <matsp55  2008-05-14 04:53:29 
Re: Radioreference.com forums comments
MegaForce <MegaForce.2  2008-05-15 21:41:37 
Re: Radioreference.com forums comments
Sarah Czepiel <ninety7  2008-05-16 15:20:53 
Re: Radioreference.com forums comments
Mats Peterson <matsp55  2008-05-17 15:03:09 
Re: Radioreference.com forums comments
Sarah Czepiel <ninety7  2008-05-18 13:17:30 
Re: Radioreference.com forums comments
Mats Peterson <matsp55  2008-05-18 20:56:29 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Sat Nov 22 6:34:11 CST 2008.