Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Electronic Equipment > Radio Scanner > Re: ****table P...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 5 of 6 Topic 5325 of 5423
Post > Topic >>

Re: ****table Phones: Base vs. Handset Frequencies

by ~db~® <deepblack@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Jul 3, 2008 at 05:03 PM

On Mon, 30 Jun 2008 17:50:50 -0400, ~db~®
<deepblack@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:

>On Mon, 30 Jun 2008 08:08:28 -0700 (PDT), Connah
><connah@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
>>> Perhaps the image of the first IF and the
tx/rx
>split is the same?
>>
>>Hi, Brad! Thanks for your input. I must admit, I
>am ignorant of the
>>subject of images though I have heard of this
>topic repeatedly. Would
>>you mind explaining your thoughts in layman's
>terms or pointing me to
>>a site where I could educate myself on this? I'm
>very interested in
>>learning about. Thanks again, Brad! Have a good
>one.
>>
>>Matthew
>
>
>Every modern radio receiver uses intermediate
>frequencies in the demodulation process.  This
>results in better quality signals being fed to
the
>audio anplifier; thus, better quality sound from
>the loudspeaker.  Usually the IF is given in the
>specs of the scanner, and by convention, 10.7 MHz
>is used in consumer radio sets.   To get the
image
>frequency of any given channel, double the IF and
>add and/or subtract the result to/from the given
>frequency.
>
>For example, my local NOAA frequency is 162.4
MHz.
>Image frequencies for it will be at 162.4 MHz. ±
>21.4 MHz., or at 183.8 MHz. and 141.0 MHz.  (2 X
>10.7 MHz. = 21.4 MHz.) 
>
> Tune your scanner to a given station's image
>frequency, and you may hear a signal strong
enough
>to make you think that the station is operating
on
>that channel; or stations operating on an image
>frequency may effectively jam reception of a
>desired frequency.  Which as Brad points out, may
>be the case with your base/handset channel pair.
>Receivers which employ multiple intermediate
>frequencies aren't as susceptible to this issue.
>
>
>~db~®


To add a little bit of hopefully useful
information to the above, high end receivers will
say in their specs that they employ "dual
conversion" (two IF's) or "triple conversion"
(three IF's).  A good explanation of how radio
signals are demodulated can be found in Robert W.
Shrader's "Electronic Communication," published by
McGraw-Hill.  The most recent edition retails for
over $100 US; one might try to pick up a used copy
somewhere, or borrow one from the public library.


~db~®
 




 6 Posts in Topic:
Portable Phones: Base vs. Handset Frequencies
Connah <connah@[EMAIL   2008-06-27 08:50:02 
Re: Portable Phones: Base vs. Handset Frequencies
Brad <google@[EMAIL PR  2008-06-28 23:07:57 
Re: Portable Phones: Base vs. Handset Frequencies
Connah <connah@[EMAIL   2008-06-30 08:08:28 
Re: Portable Phones: Base vs. Handset Frequencies
~db~® <deepblack@[EMAI  2008-06-30 17:50:50 
Re: Portable Phones: Base vs. Handset Frequencies
~db~® <deepblack@[EMAI  2008-07-03 17:03:36 
Re: Portable Phones: Base vs. Handset Frequencies
Brad <google@[EMAIL PR  2008-07-01 18:32:40 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Sat Nov 22 6:16:00 CST 2008.