On Mon, 17 Nov 2008 20:04:30 -0800 (PST), lbbss <labicff@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>I have heard lots of news about health risks with cell phone, but not
>much on cordless phones. I assume they have similar health risk as
>cell phone.
Big difference. Cordless phones can't be used while driving so the risk
is far lower. Also cordless phones are very low power.
>If so, which cordless phone frequencies are safer
>(900Mhz, 2.8Ghz, 5.8Ghz or 6.0 Dect)? If I had to pick, which is
>the lesser of the evils?
The frequency does not affect the type of calls you receive.
>And yes, I know that using a corded phone is
>the best way, but sometimes I need the convenience.
Cordless phones is safer than corded because lightning can't
get to habdset.
>And yes, I do
>realize they might not be as bad as some say, but there is nothing
>wrong with being cautious. Thanks for the input.
Cordless phones are safer in some respects.
Barry
=====
Home page
http://members.iinet.net.au/~barry.og
|
