Chuck,
Where is the relevance of your references? Who created and voted on
those references? They are a fools attempt to control and restrict
something
that in it's inception was intended to be open and unrestricted by people
exactly like yourself. It is hard to understand who exactly you think you
are and your role to police top/bottom posting on Usenet groups.
Your very words imply that those rules/suggestions are somehow
sanctioned and official. "...to observe the behaviour standards
specified..." Specified by whom, who are you or who wrote those
references?
You do not list one Usent reference. Show me one official Usenet do***ent
reference the use of either top or bottom posting! You're a control freak,
something isn't right unless it meets your limited restrictive view of
what
is right or correct.
Heaven forbid you would ever subscribe to some of the groups I
monitor,
horrors..., they post using unicode in foreign languages. And bottom
posting, sometimes you have to scroll through 3 or 4 pages of replies and
counter replies just to find an original thought or addition that you
haven't already read 3 or 4 times.
Let me ask, do you bottom post your emails? Now I don't know how you
will answer but I have never seen anybody bottom post an email. Why not if
you think it is so im****tant to forum posts, what's the difference?
--
Sincerely,
Brad Velander.
"CBFalconer" <cbfalconer@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
news:48E9AE97.BFF88811@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Obviously you consider a polite request to observe the behaviour
> standards specified for Usenet as 'obnoxious', even when the
> request is accompanied with references and justification. It is
> hard to understand such people.
>
> --
> [mail]: Chuck F (cbfalconer at maineline dot net)
> [page]: <http://cbfalconer.home.att.net>
> Try the download section.
|
