Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Electronic Equipment > Electronics Cad > Re: IPC-2581
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 24 of 34 Topic 2458 of 2514
Post > Topic >>

Re: IPC-2581

by rickman <gnuarm@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Oct 8, 2008 at 03:51 AM

On Oct 8, 5:34=A0am, Oliver Betz <ob...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> "Brad Velander" wrote:
> > =A0 =A0Where is the relevance of your references? Who created and
voted=
 on
> >those references?
>
> unim****tant. These references IMNSHO don't need to be "external"
> justifications. It's up to you to understand the idea and decide
> whether to follow.
>
> > They are a fools attempt to control and restrict something
>
> nack. They thought about politeness and efficiency.
>
> >that in it's inception was intended to be open and unrestricted by
peopl=
e
>
> it's less a question of "restrict" but more of being polite.
>
> I agree that top posting, maybe even with a full quote is _impolite_
> to the recipient of a message (because those postings are inefficient
> to read).
>
> Since there are many recipients, the sender should spend some work on
> the message.
>
> BTW: This includes also proper formatting. I don't like to be pressed
> to trim lines when I reply. I ask a new poster _once_ to set his news
> client correctly. Next time I simply don't reply even if I could
> commit something useful.

This is exactly why I stopped worrying about whether everyone top
posts and trims or not.  The incessant reminders have the potential of
turning every thread into an argument over religious beliefs on top/
bottom posting.

CBF, I have to ask, is it really helping?
 




 34 Posts in Topic:
IPC-2581
rickman <gnuarm@[EMAIL  2008-10-01 00:00:33 
Re: IPC-2581
Jim Granville <no.spam  2008-10-01 23:49:49 
Re: IPC-2581
"Brad Velander"  2008-10-01 21:58:32 
Re: IPC-2581
CBFalconer <cbfalconer  2008-10-02 18:32:09 
Re: IPC-2581
"Brad Velander"  2008-10-02 23:25:21 
Re: IPC-2581
Wim Lewis <wiml@[EMAIL  2008-10-05 00:10:28 
Re: IPC-2581
"Brad Velander"  2008-10-05 18:36:58 
Re: IPC-2581
CBFalconer <cbfalconer  2008-10-06 02:22:15 
Re: IPC-2581
"Brad Velander"  2008-10-07 23:18:05 
Re: IPC-2581
Oliver Betz <obetz@[EM  2008-10-08 11:34:59 
Re: IPC-2581
CBFalconer <cbfalconer  2008-10-08 17:03:34 
Re: Posting formats
"Brad Velander"  2008-10-08 21:59:17 
Re: Posting formats
Paul Carpenter <paul@[  2008-10-09 08:36:09 
Re: Posting formats
"Michael N. Moran&qu  2008-10-09 08:53:00 
Re: Posting formats
Oliver Betz <obetz@[EM  2008-10-09 19:40:43 
Re: IPC-2581
rickman <gnuarm@[EMAIL  2008-10-03 11:24:47 
Re: IPC-2581
rickman <gnuarm@[EMAIL  2008-10-03 11:32:46 
Re: IPC-2581
"Brad Velander"  2008-10-03 21:53:52 
Re: IPC-2581
"IB" <ib@[EM  2008-10-06 21:21:20 
Re: IPC-2581
rickman <gnuarm@[EMAIL  2008-10-06 06:12:26 
Re: IPC-2581
"Brad Velander"  2008-10-07 23:04:25 
Re: IPC-2581
rickman <gnuarm@[EMAIL  2008-10-06 14:47:13 
Re: IPC-2581
CBFalconer <cbfalconer  2008-10-06 19:14:46 
Re: IPC-2581
rickman <gnuarm@[EMAIL  2008-10-08 03:51:55 
Re: IPC-2581
Oliver Betz <obetz@[EM  2008-10-08 13:10:43 
Re: IPC-2581
Chris H <chris@[EMAIL   2008-10-08 12:18:06 
Re: ARPANET Pining
"Brad Velander"  2008-10-08 22:25:16 
Re: ARPANET Pining
CBFalconer <cbfalconer  2008-10-09 10:30:00 
Top posting (was: IPC-2581)
CBFalconer <cbfalconer  2008-10-08 17:08:00 
Re: ARPANET Pining
Chris H <chris@[EMAIL   2008-10-09 07:43:30 
Re: Posting formats
Chris H <chris@[EMAIL   2008-10-09 07:48:11 
Re: Posting formats
rickman <gnuarm@[EMAIL  2008-10-09 04:49:03 
Re: Posting formats
Paul Carpenter <paul@[  2008-10-09 17:07:24 
Re: ARPANET Pining
rickman <gnuarm@[EMAIL  2008-10-09 17:21:52 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Sun Nov 23 10:48:28 CST 2008.