On Oct 9, 3:36=A0am, Paul Carpenter <p...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
wrote:
> In article <DcgHk.1385$JJ4.1...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>, bvel...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> says...
>
> > Well Chuck,
> > =A0 =A0 You're the first I have ever heard of bottom posting emails.
In=
ter-mixed
> > quite possibly and I do it myself for certian types of emails/content.
=
But I
> > certainly don't need to read the original posts over and over again
wit=
h
> > every reply before I reach the new original thoughts of the current
pos=
ter.
> > But the post initiating my response is there like a footnote or
appendi=
x if
> > anybody needs such reference/memory assistance.
>
> > And I despise bottom posts because I don't want to search for their
new
> > original thoughts/comments through the prior comments and thoughts
that=
I
> > have already read, possibly several times. However, Usenet saw fit to
m=
ake
> > most forums unmoderated and without such silly rules so it is not my
sp=
ot to
> > critique others unless they are breaking a definite rule or actually
be=
ing
> > rude and obnoxious, not simply because I don't personally like their
po=
sting
> > format.
>
> Well you will find very small group of people even bothering to read
> your posts.
>
> Surprise surprise I will not see any response he ,may make to this.
So who the hell are you talking to???
|
