Talk About Network

Google





Electronic Equipment > Electronics Components > Re: Revised NXP...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 7 of 24 Topic 5850 of 6263
Post > Topic >>

Re: Revised NXP site

by John Larkin <jjlarkin@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Jun 23, 2008 at 01:57 PM

On Mon, 23 Jun 2008 13:00:04 -0700, Joerg
<notthisjoergsch@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:

>Ok, guys, we had a thread about NXP's site a while ago. Long story short 
>I wrote to them and, surprise, they engaged in a lively back-and-forth 
>improvement session and really listened. They changed a lot of stuff, 
>got rid of fluff and while not perfect yet I think the NXP site has 
>improved quite a bit. Heck, now you can even use it with Java Script 
>turned off (gets rid of the nag screen). And no, I am not paid by them, 
>just got involved because I didn't want to see a company that was good 
>to me go down the tubes.
>
>http://www.nxp.com/indexnc.html
>
>So what do thee think?


Better. I use Flashblock, and it doesn't even try anything tricky. The
structure is still pretty weird, though.

What is the "switch to classic mode/switch to liquid mode" thing at
the bottom?

And "contact" should just provide email addresses, not the dumb form
to fill out.

At least they still offer the wideband transistors!

John
 




 24 Posts in Topic:
Revised NXP site
Joerg <notthisjoergsch  2008-06-23 13:00:04 
Re: Revised NXP site
Fred Bartoli <" &  2008-06-23 22:09:54 
Re: Revised NXP site
Don McKenzie <5V@[EMAI  2008-06-24 06:14:04 
Re: Revised NXP site
Baron <baron.nospam@[E  2008-06-23 21:21:21 
Re: Revised NXP site
Rich Webb <bbew.ar@[EM  2008-06-23 16:31:47 
Re: Revised NXP site
Eeyore <rabbitsfriends  2008-06-24 02:21:07 
Re: Revised NXP site
John Larkin <jjlarkin@  2008-06-23 13:57:06 
Re: Revised NXP site
Joerg <notthisjoergsch  2008-06-23 14:21:47 
Re: Revised NXP site
JosephKK <quiettechblu  2008-06-28 07:22:01 
Re: Revised NXP site
"TT_Man" <So  2008-06-23 22:10:41 
Re: Revised NXP site
Eeyore <rabbitsfriends  2008-06-24 02:19:01 
Re: Revised NXP site
"TheM" <Dont  2008-06-24 03:40:07 
Re: Revised NXP site
Joerg <notthisjoergsch  2008-06-24 10:27:51 
Re: Revised NXP site
Robert Adsett <sub2@[E  2008-06-23 22:26:54 
Re: Revised NXP site
Franc Zabkar <fzabkar@  2008-06-24 16:09:54 
Re: Revised NXP site
Eeyore <rabbitsfriends  2008-06-24 15:19:05 
Re: Revised NXP site
Baron <baron.nospam@[E  2008-06-24 16:29:06 
Re: Revised NXP site
Rich Webb <bbew.ar@[EM  2008-06-24 10:53:14 
Re: Revised NXP site
Eeyore <rabbitsfriends  2008-06-24 17:54:27 
Re: Revised NXP site
Baron <baron.nospam@[E  2008-06-25 11:10:06 
Re: Revised NXP site
JosephKK <quiettechblu  2008-06-28 06:59:42 
Re: Revised NXP site
Baron <baron.nospam@[E  2008-06-28 20:43:46 
Re: Revised NXP site
Rene Tschaggelar <none  2008-06-28 23:46:05 
Re: Revised NXP site
JosephKK <quiettechblu  2008-06-29 16:15:43 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
localhost-V2008-12-19 Thu Jan 8 23:10:20 PST 2009.