Rich Webb wrote:
> Eeyore wrote:
> >Joerg wrote:
> >
> >> Ok, guys, we had a thread about NXP's site a while ago. Long story
short
> >> I wrote to them and, surprise, they engaged in a lively
back-and-forth
> >> improvement session and really listened. They changed a lot of stuff,
> >> got rid of fluff and while not perfect yet I think the NXP site has
> >> improved quite a bit. Heck, now you can even use it with Java Script
> >> turned off (gets rid of the nag screen). And no, I am not paid by
them,
> >> just got involved because I didn't want to see a company that was
good
> >> to me go down the tubes.
> >>
> >> http://www.nxp.com/indexnc.html
> >>
> >> So what do thee think?
> >
> >BROWSER UNSUP****TED (Opera 8.51)
> >
> >SO another giant leap backwards for NXP.
> >
> >Have these guys never heard of html ?
>
> Holy schnockers, Opera 8.51? Why not upgrade to the current (9.5)
> release?
Bloatware (damn them).
However that doesn't really address my comment. What's wrong with a
standards
compliant site ?
Graham
|
