On Mon, 23 Jun 2008 13:57:06 -0700, John Larkin
<jjlarkin@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>On Mon, 23 Jun 2008 13:00:04 -0700, Joerg
><notthisjoergsch@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
>>Ok, guys, we had a thread about NXP's site a while ago. Long story short
>>I wrote to them and, surprise, they engaged in a lively back-and-forth
>>improvement session and really listened. They changed a lot of stuff,
>>got rid of fluff and while not perfect yet I think the NXP site has
>>improved quite a bit. Heck, now you can even use it with Java Script
>>turned off (gets rid of the nag screen). And no, I am not paid by them,
>>just got involved because I didn't want to see a company that was good
>>to me go down the tubes.
>>
>>http://www.nxp.com/indexnc.html
>>
>>So what do thee think?
>
>
>Better. I use Flashblock, and it doesn't even try anything tricky. The
>structure is still pretty weird, though.
>
>What is the "switch to classic mode/switch to liquid mode" thing at
>the bottom?
>
>And "contact" should just provide email addresses, not the dumb form
>to fill out.
>
>At least they still offer the wideband transistors!
>
>John
There is a good reason for the contact form. You are expected to see
that when you think about that.


|