Re: F-plug need to be fully tightened?

GoldIntermetallicEmbrittlement wrote:
> On Sun, 21 Sep 2008 00:55:42 +0100, The Natural Philosopher <a@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> wrote:
> 
>> GoldIntermetallicEmbrittlement wrote:
>>> On Sat, 20 Sep 2008 09:15:26 +0100, The Natural Philosopher <a@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> GoldIntermetallicEmbrittlement wrote:
>>>>> On Thu, 18 Sep 2008 09:51:40 +0100, The Natural Philosopher <a@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> The other problem is that such "layers" between a true metal to
metal
>>>>>>> contact makes for a very noisy electron stream, as well as the
losses
>>>>>>> presented by the higher resistance.
>>>>>> That's less releavant at RF..unless its wobbling in the breeze.
>>>>>   It is the same thing as "shot noise". electrons banging into
things
>>>>> along their path.
>>>> Shot noise is merely the noise inherent in a current because its made
up 
>>>> of discrete units of charge.
>>>>
>>>> Got nothing to do with connectors.
>>>
>>>  Shot noise is that which is generated by a very simple thing, known
as
>>> friction, and it is inherent in ANY medium which electrons pass
through,
>>> including conductors.
>>>
>> Why not educte yourself befre opening your mouth?
> 
>   I can immediately tell what you need stuffed into yours, asswipe.
> 
>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shot_noise
>>
>>>   It just happens to be far more prevalent in bulk mediums, like the
old
>>> carbon comp resistance mediums.  It has more to do with imperfect
crystal
>>> lattices than anything else.
>> It has nothing to do with any of that.
> 
>   Tell us, oh guru of mouthyness, what is it that generates the heat in
a
> conductor.  Do not merely say "current", tell us what the physical
> mechanism is that causes the medium to rise in temperature.
> 
It ain't shot noise.

Read what I posted, and learn to talk the talk and walk the walk. Don't 
disagree with me, disagree with whoever called it shot noise in the 
first place.

Shot noise is not thermal noise.

>  In steel transformer cores, they have constant pole reversals
generating
> heat via hysteresis.  What is the mechanism in electron flow through a
> conductor or semiconductor?
> 
Electron or hole transfer of charge. By majority (cndutor)  or minority 
(semiconductor) carriers.

I have forgtten more than you apparently know, so don't piss around.

>   Then, in your infinite wisdom, tell us why fluctuations can be
detected
> in the signal flows through such mediums as conductors, or ANY medium
for
> that matter.
> 
For many many reasons,. of which shot noise is only one. Shot noise, 
thermal noise and flicker noise come to mind as the most relevant to 
circuitry.


Look them up in Wiki and learn the difference before shouting your mouth 
off to impress your little friends.



>   Or could it be that you did not foresee that such fluctuations do
> occur?
> 
>   It appears that YOU are the shot noise of the group, fluctuation boy.


It occurs to me that you are a prat who has learnt tow words that he 
doesn't actually understand, an using them to try and impress people, 
probably due to an unusually small ***** or something similar.

Anyway I didn't spend twenty tears o my life doing low level analogue 
circuit design in order to bandy words with some nerd who thinks the 
world owes him homage just because he can pronounce 'shot noise' as if 
the mere fact of saying it actually meant something.