Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Electronic Equipment > Electronics Equipment > Re: Advice on P...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 4 of 7 Topic 4246 of 4464
Post > Topic >>

Re: Advice on PC Based Logic Analyzer

by "Robert Lacoste" <use-contact-at-www-alciom-com-for-email> Apr 15, 2008 at 12:06 PM

"logicgeek" <logic.analyzer@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> a écrit dans le message de news: 
9591c2c7-93e1-4bbf-bd75-35bcfcfade68@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Apr 14, 5:24 pm, Jean-Yves <no-pub-for-jypoc...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> In article
> <e2b39746-56eb-4b83-82f9-855ba1839...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
>
>
>
>
>
> logicgeek <logic.analy...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> > Hi
>
> > I'm considering to purchase a pc based logic analyzer. After a bit of
> > shopping around I narrowed down my options to either the Logic****t
> > from Intronix or the Annie-USB from Janatek, maybe even their Logic-16
> > as well.
>
> > Before I make the final decision, is there anyone of you that owns any
> > of these instruments?
> > The obvious reason for the logic****t is the fact that it costs only U
> > $389 for 32 channels and 500Mhz sampling rate. I have however read
> > this little faq article on janatek's website on how to
> > evaluate(compare) between various logic analyzers and I'm having
> > doubts of buying a logic****t. The Annie-USB although a tad more
> > expensive seems to be a really good quality instrument. Any of you
> > having thoughts on this.
>
> > Luckily the need is not pressing so I have a couple of days.
>
> 8 channels is too low for a logic analyzer
> 16 is a minimum
> 34 is far enought
>
>My only concern thou is that it s****ts only 8-
>channels. However they have a nice little article on their website
>about evaluating logic analyzers and I must say that I agree with this
>rticle in that I will rather buy 8 'good channels' with sufficient
>buffer depth than 32 channels and anyway not be able to use them all.
(snip)

I fully agree with Jean-Yves, 8 channels is definitively not enough for a 
logic analyzer. Put it this way : If you need only 8 channels then very 
probably a decent 4-channels scope will be enough, and you will use such 
scope far more often than your logic analyzer. However if you have a REAL 
problem that actually needs a logic analyzer then you will need at leat 
20-30 channels. Just thinking at the tasks for which we have switched on
our 
TLA704 in the past 2 or 3 years we always used more than 8 channels. Even 
for the last use (debugging of a GPIB interface) we needed 8 channels for 
data plus 8 channels of control lines.
Cheers,
Robert
www.alciom.com
 




 7 Posts in Topic:
Advice on PC Based Logic Analyzer
logicgeek <logic.analy  2008-04-14 06:34:13 
Re: Advice on PC Based Logic Analyzer
Jean-Yves <no-pub-for-  2008-04-14 17:24:03 
Re: Advice on PC Based Logic Analyzer
logicgeek <logic.analy  2008-04-15 02:15:21 
Re: Advice on PC Based Logic Analyzer
"Robert Lacoste"  2008-04-15 12:06:55 
Re: Advice on PC Based Logic Analyzer
Jean-Yves <no-pub-for-  2008-04-15 14:01:31 
Re: Advice on PC Based Logic Analyzer
Rich Webb <bbew.ar@[EM  2008-04-15 09:19:24 
Re: Advice on PC Based Logic Analyzer
logicgeek <logic.analy  2008-04-16 02:32:52 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Sat Nov 22 11:46:44 CST 2008.