Re: Advice on PC Based Logic Analyzer

In article 
<9591c2c7-93e1-4bbf-bd75-35bcfcfade68@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
 logicgeek <logic.analyzer@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:

> > 8 channels is too low for a logic analyzer
> > 16 is a minimum
> > 34 is far enought
> >
> > you must count $500 for a complete logic ****t with some grabbers...!
> >
> > I never heard of this annie-usb before...
> > but saw a lot of people around here happy with their logic****t
> >
> > so...make your choice !
> >
> > --
> > Jean-Yves.- Hide quoted text -
> >
> > - Show quoted text -
> 
> What I like about the Annie-USB is that it comes complete with SMD
> grabber clips that optionally would cost some extra money.
> If you have the time go to www.janatek.com/annie-usb main.htm. It
> retails just below $500..My only concern thou is that it s****ts only 8-
> channels. However they have a nice little article on their website
> about evaluating logic analyzers and I must say that I agree with this
> article in that I will rather buy 8 'good channels' with sufficient
> buffer depth than 32 channels and anyway not be able to use them all.
> 
> The faq article is at: http://www.janatek.com/faq
buying logic
analyzer.html#6
> 
> I've talked to some people and most of them said that I should opt for
> sufficient buffer depth. What is the feedback of those happy okes
> using logic****t?

the logic****t has a compression algorythm so that he can record days of 
datas. it only records when the data changes.
the annie usb record also when the data dont change which is a waste of 
buffer...
and definitely 8 channels is not enought

the logic****t with 34 grabbers (and channels)  is around $500

the sufficient buffer depth is to compare with old logic analyzers that 
had only some ko of memory and that are unusable today.
the logic****t has enought.

-- 
Jean-Yves.